What do people like ?
TIA for replying.
Mark
Because he likes it?
HP kind of gave up on the fine art photo printer market.
Epson and Canon are still fully engaged, and both have a good range of prosumer grade printer models.
Dedicated photo printers are better for printing photographs than multi-use printers.
The type of ink you would want for making high quality prints of photographs would not necessarily be the same kind of ink you would want to print documents and envelops.
There are pigment inks, dye inks, solvent inks, and UV-cured inks.
You will need to consider what carriage width you need - 8.5, 13, or 17 inches wide.
Another advantage of a prosumer grade dedicated photo printer is that they have usually have larger ink cartridges that don't have to be replaces as often. That drops the cost per milliliter of ink considerably.
The Epson Stylus Pro R3000 or the Canon PIXMA Pro9500 Mark II have a 13 inch carriage.
Epson Stylus Photo R3000 Review & Rating | PCMag.com
Canon Pixma Pro9500 Mark II Review & Rating | PCMag.com
Basic resolution for Epson printers is reported as 360 DPI. basic resolution for Canon printers is reported as 300 DPI.
Epson uses piezoelectric print heads. Canon uses thermal print heads.
Piezoelectric print heads are expensive and have no user-serviceable parts. Defective print heads have to be replaced by a service technician.
If an Epson printer isn't used often the print head nozzles clog and you have to use ink to clear them that doesn't get used for making prints.
Thermal print heads get clogged to, but the print head has extras that take the clogged nozzle's place - Until the printer runs out of unused nozzles.
Then the print head has to be replaced, but you can do that yourself if you want to.