Oz

[manaheim]

 

[PixelRabbit]

I'm lichen that!

 

[EIngerson]

Meh, too shallow for my taste.

 

[tirediron]

I'm lichen that!

:waiting: Do I ban her for that or not?

I agree a little more DoF would have worked well here; how about a 3-5 image focus stack?

 

[Tiller]

:waiting: Do I ban her for that or not?

I agree a little more DoF would have worked well here; how about a 3-5 image focus stack?

Do it!!

 

[PixelRabbit]

*twirls hair and looks cute*

 

[manaheim]

I'm lichen that!

Wow. ouch.

Meh, too shallow for my taste.

Yeah... me too actually. :-/

I'm lichen that!

:waiting: Do I ban her for that or not?

I agree a little more DoF would have worked well here; how about a 3-5 image focus stack?

ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhh.... is THAT what focus stacking is for.

I was sitting here thinking "man... when you're getting THIS close HOW the heck could you get more of this in focus???"

I guess I need to go research how to do that.

Thanks for the comments, guys.



BTW, as a side story... it was this very "stuff" (this exactly outcropping of lichen) that made me want a macro lens. I've never wanted one before or since. Now I saw this stuff like TWO YEARS ago, and went recently and was like "there's no way that stuff is still there..." and yup... it totally is. Wacky.

 

[TATTRAT]

ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhh.... is THAT what focus stacking is for.

or shooting in A priority (helps, but not as complete as stacking), but I am pretty sure that shallow DOF was your intended effect. I dig it, but more detail would be more interesting.

 

[manaheim]

No I tried wider apertures with little effect. With a focusing distance of like 3" or whatever, DOF is not going to be a big option.