Pentax K1000/50mm 1.7/Film... Pic heavy

[jcdeboever]

People say that HP5 should not be developed in Rodinal, stand developed in the fridge for
1 hour, M4-2 and my new then Voigtlander 50F1.5asph wide open at F1.5

That is on such another level really. Makes me sad that I didn't take photography seriously back in the day. I was so into drawing and painting. The camera was just a tool for me back then. Looking back, my uncle was trying to get me to see it as an art form and I missed it.

Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk

 

[gsgary]

This might interest you, T Max100 shot at iso400 and stand developed in Rodinal with 18g of Sodium Sulphite, similar look to what you like

 

[jcdeboever]

This might interest you, T Max100 shot at iso400 and stand developed in Rodinal with 18g of Sodium Sulphite, similar look to what you like

I see what your doing, your such a tease.

Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk

 

[gsgary]

It's all about developing yourself

Sent from my SM-G903F using Tapatalk

 

[jcdeboever]

Just been to your profile page and realised you must be Jewish ? here is my wife placing a stone hope you don't mind

I don't mind but how you got I was Jewish from my profile page escapes me? My family immigrated from Belgium, they were farmers. I was born and raised in the city of Detroit.

 

[jcdeboever]

Just been to your profile page and realised you must be Jewish ? here is my wife placing a stone hope you don't mind

I don't mind but how you got I was Jewish from my profile page escapes me? I am Belgium.

You had some Hebrew was I wrong ?

Sent from my SM-G903F using Tapatalk

I am confused... Hebrew?

 

[jcdeboever]

Oh , I just seen a profile visit, never noticed that before. I usually use the tapatalk phone app and can't see it on there. Can see it on the desktop, that was a while ago too. I deleted it, not sure what that was about. That's not me, someone posted that as a visit? Strange.

 

[gsgary]

Oh , I just seen a profile visit, never noticed that before. I usually use the tapatalk phone app and can't see it on there. Can see it on the desktop, that was a while ago too. I deleted it, not sure what that was about. That's not me, someone posted that as a visit? Strange.

My bad just realise people can post message I'm a bloody idiot [emoji1]

Sent from my SM-G903F using Tapatalk

 

[jcdeboever]

Oh , I just seen a profile visit, never noticed that before. I usually use the tapatalk phone app and can't see it on there. Can see it on the desktop, that was a while ago too. I deleted it, not sure what that was about. That's not me, someone posted that as a visit? Strange.

My bad just realise people can post message I'm a bloody idiot [emoji1]

Sent from my SM-G903F using Tapatalk

It's all good, I didn't know either. I hardly go there.

Shoot, thinking about it, I wonder if that was the guy I was going to give my old Sony digital to? He might have responded that way instead of PM'ing me.

You should probably unattach that in post #39

Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk

 

[timor]

I took closer look at your scans. I think you are scanning negatives, right ? How much pp you gave them ? Seems like a lot of sharpening. Now another question steaming from that. How old was the film ? What was the processing of film ? Exactly the temperature is on my mind. Looks like there is, consistent in every frame reticulation. OK, I see, no pp, just the scanner itself.

 

[gsgary]

Nice shots. I put the K1000 down when I got my digital. Didn't get rid of it though. I think I might have a sensor issue since things seemed to consistently come out dark in the last roll or two. ................

Yep. The sensors Pentax put in the K1000's weren't very good.

What are you on about ? you get a clean one every 24 or 36 shots

 

[480sparky43 42]

Nice shots. I put the K1000 down when I got my digital. Didn't get rid of it though. I think I might have a sensor issue since things seemed to consistently come out dark in the last roll or two. ................

Yep. The sensors Pentax put in the K1000's weren't very good.

What are you on about ? you get a clean one every 24 or 36 shots

Wow. You mean you need to buy 2 or 3 dozen sensors just to get a new one? Boy, are YOU getting ripped off. I get a new one each time I click the shutter.

 

[gsgary]

Nice shots. I put the K1000 down when I got my digital. Didn't get rid of it though. I think I might have a sensor issue since things seemed to consistently come out dark in the last roll or two. ................

Yep. The sensors Pentax put in the K1000's weren't very good.

What are you on about ? you get a clean one every 24 or 36 shots

Wow. You mean you need to buy 2 or 3 dozens sensors just to get a new one? Boy, are YOU getting ripped off. I get a new one each time I click the shutter.

It's a 5 feet wide sensor so it is every roll

Sent from my SM-G903F using Tapatalk

 

[jcdeboever]

I took closer look at your scans. I think you are scanning negatives, right ? How much pp you gave them ? Seems like a lot of sharpening. Now another question steaming from that. How old was the film ? What was the processing of film ? Exactly the temperature is on my mind. Looks like there is, consistent in every frame reticulation. OK, I see, no pp, just the scanner itself.

Are you referring to mine? I just pulled them off the CD using Gimp / Linux. Dwayne's Photo did all the work. The film was not very old and in kept cool. I have a few expired rolls of B&W but have not used them yet. I am going to use them in my Holga35

Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk

 

[timor]

Thanks.
There is an inherent problem with labs and b&w film. They tend to overdevelop film just to make sure there is something on it. So it was them doing post on scans and they caused what seems to be reticulation on whatever is that texture in the pics. It is very hard to cause reticulation with modern films, but happens. B&w film development is much more "organic" and always specific to the guy, who does it.