I have a LOT of respect for KmH's knowledge of many,many photography subjects. He is one of TPF's most-respected, most even-keeled members, in my opinion. He's a big-time Photoshop type guy. I OTOH, am a Photoshop minimalist. I am a slow,deliberate software upgrader, and realllllly hate to upgrade from one version of PS, or Nikon Capture, or computer Operating System. But honestly, I think KmH is barking up the WRONG TREE on this issue of Photoshop CS, any variant, versus Lightroom 4.1...
Lightroom 4.1 is a remarkable advancement in RAW processing capabilities. I myself JUST started using LR 3.6, which I got cheap, after 4.0 hit the streets. From a "photographer's point of view", the capabilities of Lightroom are, here comes that word again,
remarkable. I have a shooting buddy, who is a member here on TPF, and another long-time friend who used to work for a major US daily newspaper as the HEAD pre-press photo prep and toning dude, for over 20 years...both of them have shown me, personally, at their screens, how LR absolutely kicks butt. My newspaper buddy is used to working with HUGE numbers of images coming in from multiple sources, and for also importing,keywording, and automatically uploading tagged, and keyworded, and captioned images to FTP and other servers, as well as uploading to web galleries to
almost instantaneously fulfill CLIENT REQUESTS for images to review for purchase, based on search engine hits generated by clients...allowing him to sit down at Lightroom, and search for keyword matches, and then nearly instantly, have Lightroom locate images, and then help him format web galleries that are ready for automatic upload to various photo selling site, or toi his own server, for client perusal and purchase--within mere minutes. But LR is much more than a cataloging and web-published application.
In another vein...Lightroom 4 has a new type of INCREDIBLE highlight/shadow recovery that, as far as I know, is as-yet-unequalled by any other Adobe program. Here is an article entitled "tonal Adjustments in the Age of Lightroom 4" by Charles Cramer, published on the well-respected web site The Luminous Landscape.
Tonal Adjustments in the Age of Lightroom 4
I dunno..there are "some features" that PS does better...like cloning on portraits...CS is FAR better, IMHO, for REAL-WORLD PORTRAIT "spotting" and "dust removal". Still...using LR 3.6, I have personally been able to HUGELY INCREASE the speed and efficiency of "my" file handling and retouching and color-toning + effects applications. SO, with ONE MONTH of Lightroom experience and four real-world, 1-hour LR tutorials, I have been able to easily kick PS CS's a&& in file handling and prep time. Yeah...for pixel-level editing, CS is undoubtedly better,and for removing facial blemishes and moles, the "Way" the clone tool works in CS is vastly better for me...BUT, for enhancing real-world digital images by the 8-gigabyte-card-full???
LIGHTROOM, baby, Lightroom. In this new web-based imaging environment, LR has many advantages for the photographer who needs to "handle" images more so than "edit them at the pixel level".