Bryston3bsst
No longer a newbie, moving up!
- Joined
- Jun 10, 2015
- Messages
- 218
- Reaction score
- 125
- Location
- Florida
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos NOT OK to edit
- Banned
- #1
.
Last edited:
This website is considered to be family-friendly, and placing some control over what is posted helps members feel more comfortable in allowing their children to visit.Well, this is very curious indeed. A photography forum that has an issue with nude or semi nude pictures.
I've been posting some pretty bold semi nude photos and there were no trouble at all.I just joined and I am trying to get the rules down so as to not offend anyone. I see no area for specific posting of images that might be considered offensive by some, that is semi nude, lingerie or even somewhat suggestive. I read the policy and it makes reference to a subscription. I clicked the link provided and got 'file not found'. Is this a situation where you have to pay to be able to post a somewhat sexy picture?
Could someone clarify please?
not so sure on the pay plan for it, but i do appreciate the separate forum for it and when people put nsfw in the titles. I often surf the site with a kid next to me or over my shoulder (they like to look at some of the pics too) and not once have i come across something they shouldn't have seen. The users themselves are doing a great job with the warnings and nsfw in the titles.This is an issue that has gone back and forth over the years.
For a while, we did have a public NSFW section, but the problem with having a specific section with a name like that, is that shows up in searches and would give the forum overall, a mature or 18+ rating.
The policy of the owners is that it's just better to skip that section and promote the site as family friendly etc.
Of course, as photographers, we realize that photos of scantily clad people is a very popular subject, so as a compromise we included a section for it with our member/subscription plan. And as mentioned, that feature hasn't yet made it's into the new site format.
So.....the way that is has currently been working, is that if someone has photos to share that might be considered NSFW, they add that to the title. And as long as nobody complains, it stays. Of course, this is taken on a case by case basis. Raunchy pornography would probably be taken down, while suggestive & artistic shots are probably safe.
Of course, people often forget the simple solution. If you want to show off and discuss your NSFW photos, you can host them somewhere else and then just link to them rather than displaying them directly in the forum. With 'standard content' images, doing this would usually result in very few people taking the time to leave the site to view your photos....but with NSFW content, I don't think that would be a problem.
I didn't get it at first either. But after some thought.... I have restrictions and parental blockers on my kids devices so they are stopped from going to some sites online. If they changed that, then this site may not be accessible to many minors. Other thing is a lot of minors may come on here, join or not but still do as they are interested in photography. The pay section keeps them from such comment, as chances are most minors can't cough up a credit card. Not so sure on the pay section for it, but in a way i guess it makes some sort of sense.Well, this is very curious indeed. A photography forum that has an issue with nude or semi nude pictures. And the prospect of paying for the 'privilege' of posting a nude......really? That, at least to me, is kind of humorous.
I am a member of a few other forums all of which simply have a section usually labeled Glamor. This where pictures that might be even slightly suggestive to full nudes are posted. And please know I am using the term nude here for lack of a better word. I am not referring to anything even verging on pornography. In fact the general rule is no exposed genitalia. It's quite simple and all members, being mature adults, abide by it. Those browsing the forum that don't care to look at nude or suggestive pictures just do go into that particular sub forum.
Photographers have shooting nudes since cameras were invented. To have a meeting place for professional and amateur photographers and not have a place to post one of the most popular forms of photography is just odd.
Are we really still trying to hold on to the archaic beliefs of the 1930s in regard to the unclothed human form? Especially in a meeting place of artists. I guess I'm a little surprised that I'm even writing this. Why should I have to?
Forum has probably been taken over by bible bashers, nudes were some of the first subject when photography started anyone who has a problem with nudes being posted has a very big problemWell, this is very curious indeed. A photography forum that has an issue with nude or semi nude pictures. And the prospect of paying for the 'privilege' of posting a nude......really? That, at least to me, is kind of humorous.
I am a member of a few other forums all of which simply have a section usually labeled Glamor. This where pictures that might be even slightly suggestive to full nudes are posted. And please know I am using the term nude here for lack of a better word. I am not referring to anything even verging on pornography. In fact the general rule is no exposed genitalia. It's quite simple and all members, being mature adults, abide by it. Those browsing the forum that don't care to look at nude or suggestive pictures just do go into that particular sub forum.
Photographers have shooting nudes since cameras were invented. To have a meeting place for professional and amateur photographers and not have a place to post one of the most popular forms of photography is just odd.
Are we really still trying to hold on to the archaic beliefs of the 1930s in regard to the unclothed human form? Especially in a meeting place of artists. I guess I'm a little surprised that I'm even writing this. Why should I have to?
Look, I really didn't aim to drag this into a major discussion, albeit interesting. So forgive me for taking up so much time and resource.
Capisce?