What's new

Pregnant wife c&c (aka please be gentle)

Being compared to Rembrandt is beyond generous.

But thank you for the advice.
 
The light is bang on Rembrandt lighting, which is a good way to start. You put the sun in a good place.

The problem here is that this "key light" (the sun, and in fact your only light) was a bit harsh, so you wound up with a long range of values from the shadows to the highlights. Since you got the shadowed side of her face nicely lit, the sunlit side of her face is too bright.

The easy solution is to bounce some light into the shadows. Set up something, anything, a guy in a white shirt, a light colored lawn chair, a light colored car out of frame to the left, on her shadowed side. Imagine it's a mirror, try to reflect some light onto her face and body from the front and side. This will fill in the shadows so they're not so dark. Then you can expose the WHOLE FRAME less, without the shadows becoming unpleasantly dark, and this will reduce the excess brightness on the sunlit side of her face.

If you happened to have a day with thin cloud, you might be better off, since this would diffuse the sun a little, making the light less harsh but maintaining some directionality to it (a fully cloudy day loses all the shadows, and everything looks flat and dull).

Remember where the sun was for this one, though, you had it in a good place. You had is in the place Rembrandt put it, so don't let some guy on the internet tell you it was in the wrong spot ;)

Of course it is the wrong spot. It is a harsh sun, no reflector, no off camera flash. Put that into the equation, it is the wrong spot.


Harsh sun.. i either go with the easy way putting the subject in the shadow OR put sun behind the subject with dark background like below.

181304_430928203596619_546156100_n.jpg
 
To be fair, Rembrandt Lighting is just a technical term referring to where you stick the lights ;)
 
The light is bang on Rembrandt lighting

I'm going to have to disagree with you on that one. I don't find there to be enough contrast in the lighting to really say that it's "bang on Rembrandt."
 
Being compared to Rembrandt is beyond generous.

But thank you for the advice.

He's not comparing you to Rembrandt. Rembrandt lighting is a term for lighting that is above, in front and to the side of the subject at a 45 degree angle. It's also known as triangle lighting. Although I wouldn't call it bang on Rembrandt Lighting.

Rembrandt lighting - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
The light is bang on Rembrandt lighting

I'm going to have to disagree with you on that one. I don't find there to be enough contrast in the lighting to really say that it's "bang on Rembrandt."

Being compared to Rembrandt is beyond generous.

But thank you for the advice.

He's not comparing you to Rembrandt. Rembrandt lighting is a term for lighting that is above, in front and to the side of the subject at a 45 degree angle. It's also known as triangle lighting. Although I wouldn't call it bang on Rembrandt Lighting.

Rembrandt lighting - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

We have a habit of posting pretty much the same thing right after one another today. ;)
 
The light is bang on Rembrandt lighting

I'm going to have to disagree with you on that one. I don't find there to be enough contrast in the lighting to really say that it's "bang on Rembrandt."

You are 2 for 2 today for posting something similar to mine within a few seconds. Knock it off Tyler, it's creeping me out! ;)
 
The light is bang on Rembrandt lighting

I'm going to have to disagree with you on that one. I don't find there to be enough contrast in the lighting to really say that it's "bang on Rembrandt."

Being compared to Rembrandt is beyond generous.

But thank you for the advice.

He's not comparing you to Rembrandt. Rembrandt lighting is a term for lighting that is above, in front and to the side of the subject at a 45 degree angle. It's also known as triangle lighting. Although I wouldn't call it bang on Rembrandt Lighting.

Rembrandt lighting - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

We have a habit of posting pretty much the same thing right after one another today. ;)

UNREAL!!! Make that 3 for 3!
 
Whoa guys I know he wasn't comparing me to Rembrant.

It was a joke. Apparently not very good.

Sorry.
 
The light is bang on Rembrandt lighting, which is a good way to start. You put the sun in a good place.

The problem here is that this "key light" (the sun, and in fact your only light) was a bit harsh, so you wound up with a long range of values from the shadows to the highlights. Since you got the shadowed side of her face nicely lit, the sunlit side of her face is too bright.

The easy solution is to bounce some light into the shadows. Set up something, anything, a guy in a white shirt, a light colored lawn chair, a light colored car out of frame to the left, on her shadowed side. Imagine it's a mirror, try to reflect some light onto her face and body from the front and side. This will fill in the shadows so they're not so dark. Then you can expose the WHOLE FRAME less, without the shadows becoming unpleasantly dark, and this will reduce the excess brightness on the sunlit side of her face.

If you happened to have a day with thin cloud, you might be better off, since this would diffuse the sun a little, making the light less harsh but maintaining some directionality to it (a fully cloudy day loses all the shadows, and everything looks flat and dull).

Remember where the sun was for this one, though, you had it in a good place. You had is in the place Rembrandt put it, so don't let some guy on the internet tell you it was in the wrong spot ;)

Of course it is the wrong spot. It is a harsh sun, no reflector, no off camera flash. Put that into the equation, it is the wrong spot.


Harsh sun.. i either go with the easy way putting the subject in the shadow OR put sun behind the subject with dark background like below.

181304_430928203596619_546156100_n.jpg

I like the idea about putting them in the shadow. Never thought of that.
 
the sample i showed you, they are not in the shadow. The sun is hitting them from the back from knee up. I think it is better than putting them completely in the shadow.
 
Yeah that makes sense.
 
Also if you compare between the sun hitting the subject from the back, vs the subject is completely in the shadow, sun hitting the back is brighter. So if I had told them to move 10 ft to the back and shot it with the same settings, they would have been darker. If I up the exposure, then your background will be more blown. Make sense?
 
I think. B/c the camera would have to compensate for them being darker so upping the exposure for them to be correctly exposed would leave the background overexposed?
 

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account on our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom