So how often do you get an amazing shot......that is never allowed to see the light of day? Does it bother you that they get filed away in a secure data base somewhere and will never get seen?
Are you ever allowed to get artistic with your photos or is it mostly straight up photojournalism?
Unfortunately the answer to that first question is a lot. Ive got an entire two months worth of photos from a foreign country from my first deployment that are not releasable. Thats not to say I dont have them I do, theyre not classified or anything. But theyre not permitted for public release. That means no Flickr, Facebook, maybe a print portfolio but thats it.
I had an amazing shoot a while back where I got a few images that were very important to me. We fought to get them released but it just did not work out. Its hard not to get attached to my imagery but its the nature of the beast.
When we release an image we have to ask ourselves if it helps our mission or hinders it. Does what were portraying to the public match the image and goals were trying to project?
Say for example I take an amazing image of a wounded Marine. Beautiful and moving, full of emotion. If we release that, what does it add to the mission? Its going to get picked up by external media, its going to freak out his wife and family, and potentially upset the public. Were not really supposed to be runnin and gunnin out here any more, so releasing an image like that would hurt what were trying to accomplish.
It sucks, but I have to realize that my work isnt always about me.
As for your question, I am definitely encouraged to be artistic with my photos. Its just like with any other industry imagery can effect people emotionally and influence things. The better the imagery the better the influence.
However, I also follow strict integrity guidelines. We dont edit images to the point of falsifying reality and marketing it as such. If we manipulate something extensively through photoshop then it is considered a Photo Illustration and not a photo, really. Journalistic integrity is very important in our line of work.
The short answer is I can be as creative as the mission requires. If Im just taking battle damage imagery of a blown up tank used for a briefing I dont really need to be doing long exposures and crazy compositions.
lambertpix said:
Wow.. what a fantastic thread. Thanks so much for your service and for taking the time for the Q&A. I followed your flickr feed, too -- you've got some great stuff there. You touched on some of the editorial parts of your workflow -- I assumed you wouldn't have copyright or control over what gets published. Can you share anything about how you get your assignments (ie, are you looking for specific types of shots, or just whatever seems meaningful wherever you're embedded) and what happens to images once you shoot them (ie, do you do post-processing yourself or just hand the cards over to someone for editing)?
Thanks! Youre right in that I dont have any control over my copyright. All of my work is in the public domain. Any one can use it for any reason.
How I get my assignments depends mostly on who we support as a unit. For example at a battalion a photographer would support battalion operations. Since Im with the Command Element, I support people such as the Commanding General and the smaller units that fall underneath us for support.
Honestly its as easy as someone calling us up and saying, Hey, weve got a cool patrol coming up. Want to go? What we do is dependent on what everyone else is doing at the time.
As for the shoot itself, Im basically looking for a variety of good images that tell the story of what is going on. Same with any basic photojournalism event. I cover the main purpose, some portraits on the side, really whatever the situation dictates. I have to be flexible. Ive shot some really boring stuff, too.
As for the process I edit and caption all of my own imagery. I take things back, pick my selects (about 10-15 of the best images), and write my captions. From there the releasing authority (my boss) checks it over, gives the green light, and we upload it to the Defense Video & Imagery Distribution System (dvidshub.net) where it goes out into the world.
sashbar said:
Tamgerine - do you draw the line between a military photographer and a war correspondent? If yes, where is it? If no, why?
I had a friend who was not a military, he was a newspaper stuff photographer. But he worked in a war zone. One day he was sitting on a bus with locals, the bus was stopped by the rebels. They spotted his camera, took him aside, shot in the head and dumped his body in a roadside ditch. He was quite pro-rebel actually. That was in Chechnya.
PS - If you work in Kabul NATO base, we may have some common friends.
We absolutely draw the line between Combat Camera and a correspondent, who is technically public affairs. Theyre two completely separate occupational fields (4600 and 4300). As 4600s we do NOT write stories. Think of Combat Camera as internal media and public affairs as external media. We have different duties and responsibilities.
Im sorry about your friend. Photo journalism can be a dangerous job. Im lucky that whenever I go out I always have my own weapons and security. Being surrounded by other Marines with guns is always a nice feeling.
Im not in Kabul, though. Its Camp Leatherneck all the way for me.
Steve5D said:
I served as the ship's photographer for a couple of ships I was stationed on, but nothing like this.
Any ships I would recognize? I was on the USS Kearsarge, USS Ponce, and the USS Wasp briefly.