- Joined
- Oct 2, 2008
- Messages
- 7,218
- Reaction score
- 3,078
- Location
- Vancouver Island
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos OK to edit
1.
2.
2.
I prefer the first because the bird's pose is more interesting.
I've never seen one of these, just something everyone just calls a flicker which looks similar. I wonder if these live around here. I'll have to check on that.
I prefer the first because the bird's pose is more interesting.
I've never seen one of these, just something everyone just calls a flicker which looks similar. I wonder if these live around here. I'll have to check on that.
Both this bird, and the one you've likely seen are actually Northern Flickers. There is the red-shafted Northern Flicker, mostly seen out west, and the yellow-shafted Northern Flicker, seen here in the east. They get the red-shafted/yellow-shafted description by the flash of color in the underside of their wings in flight.
They sometimes mate with Gilded Flickers, which complicates the ID completely.![]()
The male Northern Flicker has a black mustache and a red spot (triangle) on the nape of the neck, whereas baturn's sample has a red mustache. The female (N.F.) has no mustache and I don't believe sports the red spot. Most all woodpeckers have a white rump that is only visible when flying.
Nice shots baturn, they are quite skittish birds to capture. I'd love to show off my example, but alas, not the same bird. I'm in North Carolina and only have the Northern Flicker to show.