1000DUser
TPF Noob!
- Joined
- Jun 19, 2010
- Messages
- 48
- Reaction score
- 0
- Location
- KL
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos NOT OK to edit
I've decided to replace my kitlens, hoping for a sharper and better lens.
I have come down with this 3 conclusions :
17-50mm Tamron VC , 17-50mm Tamron non-VC , 15-85mm Canon 3.5-5.6 IS USM.
first i wanted to go with the tamron but hesitated cause i've read alot of complains about not sharp at f2.8 and users have dealt with loads of problems with the VC, on the other hand the non VC from reviews say its sharper and better but not rugged build. also the canon 15-85mm reviews say its sharp and has a longer focal length than the tamrons but without the constant aperture worth the money? ( i think the canon 15-85m is twice the price of the tamrons?)
I have come down with this 3 conclusions :
17-50mm Tamron VC , 17-50mm Tamron non-VC , 15-85mm Canon 3.5-5.6 IS USM.
first i wanted to go with the tamron but hesitated cause i've read alot of complains about not sharp at f2.8 and users have dealt with loads of problems with the VC, on the other hand the non VC from reviews say its sharper and better but not rugged build. also the canon 15-85mm reviews say its sharp and has a longer focal length than the tamrons but without the constant aperture worth the money? ( i think the canon 15-85m is twice the price of the tamrons?)