What's new

Rico & Leah - Pix Heavy! (29 pix)

I'm sorry but i find these quite boring, nothing different to what i see in newbs first posts you could have used some dramatic flash techique's in some of these but they all look the same and i don't see any super sharp images

Ouch.. harsh.

But I do feel like I see same photos over and over (kiss, hug etc.). You need to be more creative.


Engagement photos...kiss,hug...lol...what do you expect soft porn?
 
I'm sorry but i find these quite boring, nothing different to what i see in newbs first posts you could have used some dramatic flash techique's in some of these but they all look the same and i don't see any super sharp images

Ouch.. harsh.

But I do feel like I see same photos over and over (kiss, hug etc.). You need to be more creative.

Not Harsh, Honest, he is wanting to go pro these are no where near pro quality

well it would help to get some advice from a pro...just saying.
Hopefully one will chime in soon.
 
I'm sorry but i find these quite boring, nothing different to what i see in newbs first posts you could have used some dramatic flash techique's in some of these but they all look the same and i don't see any super sharp images

Ouch.. harsh.

But I do feel like I see same photos over and over (kiss, hug etc.). You need to be more creative.


Engagement photos...kiss,hug...lol...what do you expect soft porn?


No but adding some dramatic lighting can make a big difference, exposing for the sky and poping a bit of fill light would have looked great with the clouds
 
If I remember correctly from last conversation I had with him, he hates exposing the sky + additional lighting. Instead, he likes exposing the sky + fill light slider on LR3
 
Ouch.. harsh.

But I do feel like I see same photos over and over (kiss, hug etc.). You need to be more creative.


Engagement photos...kiss,hug...lol...what do you expect soft porn?


No but adding some dramatic lighting can make a big difference, exposing for the sky and poping a bit of fill light would have lookedgreat with the clouds

I see what your saying about dramatic lighting...but he wrote "but i do feel like I see the same photos over and over (kiss, hug etc)."

how much more creative can you get showing love with kiss/hug...without a "bend over bee-yatch..or a "down on yer knees darlin"
lol
I just thought that was an odd comment to make given the reason for this photo shoot, ya dig??
 
No but adding some dramatic lighting can make a big difference, exposing for the sky and poping a bit of fill light would have lookedgreat with the clouds

Yes, it would have been except the sky was grey mostly. Except for the last 30 mins when some blue sky came out. As for fill light, yeah I used fill flash. The fact that you can't tell I used flash makes me feel like I've accomplished what I wanted, which is, not to show presence of obvious flash use.
 
If I remember correctly from last conversation I had with him, he hates exposing the sky + additional lighting. Instead, he likes exposing the sky + fill light slider on LR3

Once again, you twist my words...or you failed to understand my point of our convo :er:
 
how much more creative can you get showing love with kiss/hug...without a "bend over bee-yatch..or a "down on yer knees darlin"
lol
I just thought that was an odd comment to make given the reason for this photo shoot, ya dig??

There weren't much ideas I had for that spot. I however would have gotten more creative with night time in the city. I could have done some things with low shutter speed there. But there's always more ideas for the next couple.
 
I'm sorry but i find these quite boring, nothing different to what i see in newbs first posts you could have used some dramatic flash techique's in some of these but they all look the same and i don't see any super sharp images

Ouch.. harsh.

But I do feel like I see same photos over and over (kiss, hug etc.). You need to be more creative.


Engagement photos...kiss,hug...lol...what do you expect soft porn?

+1.
 
I'm super confused on how these C&C threads turn into... "Who has a bigger ego-**** slinging contest"

I think they should change the name of this website to TPF "The PHIGHT Forum"
 
I'm super confused on how these C&C threads turn into... "Who has a bigger ego-**** slinging contest"

I think they should change the name of this website to TPF "The PHIGHT Forum"

Welcome to the Internet, where nobody hates a photographer more than another photographer.
 
Here's my two cents...If I were the couple and I was trying to have a part of my life captured I'd really like the results and effects of

#2, #10, #11, #14, #22

With #10 being my personal favorite of the group.
 
I'm super confused on how these C&C threads turn into... "Who has a bigger ego-**** slinging contest"

I think they should change the name of this website to TPF "The PHIGHT Forum"

Where's the ego and mud slinging, i only said what i thought
 
Just had another quick look and a lot of them are cropped too tight, if your shooting in a park show some of the park
 
I'm super confused on how these C&C threads turn into... "Who has a bigger ego-**** slinging contest"

I think they should change the name of this website to TPF "The PHIGHT Forum"

Where's the ego and mud slinging, i only said what i thought

Im not just talking about this thread. Just seems like everyone's comments are always negative.

How about a comment like.... "I don't care for picture #1... This is why and here is my advice on what I would have done differently."

Instead its.... You pictures suck and your creativity sucks. In a more beat about the bush way.
Just my opinion.
 

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account on our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

Back
Top Bottom