computer_freak
TPF Noob!
- Joined
- Apr 13, 2013
- Messages
- 1
- Reaction score
- 0
Hello I am Debating between s100 and s110
one thing that concern me is that I saw some reviews saying there are differences in image quality between the two although its using the same lens/processor and so on for expamples:
"We did feel that high ISO performance (and image quality in general) was actually a slight step backwards from the S100"
"In comparison to its predecessor, the Canon S100, the S110 boasts an upgraded sensor but our tests show a slight decrease in print quality across the board. Where the S100 produces a nice, crisp print at 13 x 19 at base ISO, the S110 is soft at 13 x 19 and, while maybe acceptable for wall display, we feel more comfortable recommending it for use at 11 x 14 for ISO 80 up to 200."
"The lower overall image quality across the ISO range compared to its predecessor is a little disappointing"
and mostly:
"There is slightly high barrel distortion at wide-angle (1.1%)" 0.6 at s100
How it could be there are such a differences? Thanks
one thing that concern me is that I saw some reviews saying there are differences in image quality between the two although its using the same lens/processor and so on for expamples:
"We did feel that high ISO performance (and image quality in general) was actually a slight step backwards from the S100"
"In comparison to its predecessor, the Canon S100, the S110 boasts an upgraded sensor but our tests show a slight decrease in print quality across the board. Where the S100 produces a nice, crisp print at 13 x 19 at base ISO, the S110 is soft at 13 x 19 and, while maybe acceptable for wall display, we feel more comfortable recommending it for use at 11 x 14 for ISO 80 up to 200."
"The lower overall image quality across the ISO range compared to its predecessor is a little disappointing"
and mostly:
"There is slightly high barrel distortion at wide-angle (1.1%)" 0.6 at s100
How it could be there are such a differences? Thanks
