Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
craig said:That is not even funny. Dare I say Kodachrome 64?
craig said:Ooops I thought you were kidding. Transparency I think is the proper term. It produces an unbeatable positive (as opposed to negative) image. Generally identified with "chrome" as the suffix Extachrome, Fujichrome etc. The film is a little unforgiving exposure wise, but like I said the results are nothing short of beautiful. Dare I say digi still can not touch it. I give it about a year. Maybe 5 years.
I suggest shooting a couple of rolls immediately. Save you pennies because the film and developing is a little pricey. Let alone making prints.
danalec99 said:Another dumb query... is it a 35mm film?
craig said:No darkroom on this end. But I have access to a couple. In this instance (and most) I shot slide film. I shoot mostly digi these days. As I have mentioned the 90 second photo lab is very liberating for me.
I agree that the 50 gets little or no credit these days. not to mention the 1.4 aperture. Manufacturing a 1.4 takes some serious engineering. I do not think the "circle of confusion" comes into play when recording with a CCD. So there is that. Plus I think people generally lost interest in paying for expensive glass (I am definitely going to get in trouble for that little statement). By the way, Leica's Leitz makes a 1.0 I am not sure if it is 50mm.
hobbes28 said:It sure is.danalec99 said:Another dumb query... is it a 35mm film?