By the way, all the references in this thread to "this poor kid" are kinda funny.
Hey, it threw me too. I went along with thinking they were "kids" since that's the way at least one member was referring to the player in the photo. Without researching the league, teams, players, fans, facilities, etc., I mentioned his "schoolmates", when it turns out these players are full grown adults, and the PIFL is serious business, not some local high school thing. I stand corrected.
Website for the Professional Indoor Football League:
Tickets
Season tickets start at $75 on the first team's website I looked at.
With this professional football league's teams, players, cheerleaders, fans, stadiums, box seats, tickets, merchandise and all the rest - there's no doubt in my mind that it's about making money for somebody, just as much as any other professional sports league, just on a smaller scale.
Now try to imagine their league and team websites with no photos on them. Pretty boring, right? Yeah, that's why photos add value to websites like that, and that's why they should have no problem paying for that added value, IMHO.
Again, not my issue, since it's not my photo, but I personally wouldn't "donate" my work to a profitable organization like the PIFL, or any of it's teams, or any of it's "poor kid" players even, any more than I would donate it to the NFL.
But that's just me.