captain-spanky
TPF Noob!
- Joined
- Jul 14, 2003
- Messages
- 751
- Reaction score
- 2
- Location
- in a bubble in Yorkshire, UK
- Website
- www.higg.co.uk
situation:
a photographer visits a car show.
said photographer takes an image of a car at the show.
photgrapher then starts selling prints of the image.
owner of the car, sees the pictures and gets a bee in the bonnet.
car owner demands monitary recompense for the 'usage' of the afformentioned vehicle in the images.
where do the photgrapher and car owner stand in a situation like this?
am i correct in assuming that since the car was at a public show, the owner has no legal right to any proceeds for the sale of the artwork?
a photographer visits a car show.
said photographer takes an image of a car at the show.
photgrapher then starts selling prints of the image.
owner of the car, sees the pictures and gets a bee in the bonnet.
car owner demands monitary recompense for the 'usage' of the afformentioned vehicle in the images.
where do the photgrapher and car owner stand in a situation like this?
am i correct in assuming that since the car was at a public show, the owner has no legal right to any proceeds for the sale of the artwork?