So much for the "No Pros use Sony" argument :p

[Overread]

Not so fast...

I counted 35 Canon and 44 Nikon.

Come on man, it is clear that it is photoshoped with more black lenses

Ha! I shoot a canon with a black 70-200 f/2.8 lens. OBVIOUSLY so do the ones with black lenses in there! LOL!

SIGMA for the WIN!

 

[unpopular]

^^ notice heated debates never erupt about Tamron v. Sigma? I'd like to see a battle over the most mediocre, hohum lens.

 

[MLeeK]

^^ notice heated debates never erupt about Tamron v. Sigma? I'd like to see a battle over the most mediocre, hohum lens.

Vivitar, rokinon or bower all have equally sh!tty stuff on the market these days!

 

[unpopular]

NO WAY! Tamron is the sh*tiest of sh*t! so stfu.

 

[gsgary]

Come on man, it is clear that it is photoshoped with more black lenses

Ha! I shoot a canon with a black 70-200 f/2.8 lens. OBVIOUSLY so do the ones with black lenses in there! LOL!

SIGMA for the WIN!

You mean Stigma

 

[rexbobcat]

P.E.N.T.A.X.

 

[Derrel]

Ha! I shoot a canon with a black 70-200 f/2.8 lens. OBVIOUSLY so do the ones with black lenses in there! LOL!

SIGMA for the WIN!

You mean Stigma

NOT Stigma....that is what we have from hanging out with YOU, gary....

Surely you mean SIGMA, as in SIGnifiCantMAlfunction...right...

Sigma: The King of The Jaundice Lenses! The lenses made for shooting canaries, daffodils, yellow-bellied sapsuckers, and the Green Bay Packers.

 

[Overread]

SIGMA for the WIN!

You mean Stigma

NOT Stigma....that is what we have from hanging out with YOU, gary....

Surely you mean SIGMA, as in SIGnifiCantMAlfunction...right...

Sigma: The King of The Jaundice Lenses! The lenses made for shooting canaries, daffodils, yellow-bellied sapsuckers, and the Green Bay Packers.

Pfft the only "Significant malfunction" is that you've still not bought yourself a Sigma 150mm macro

 

[Overread]

^^ notice heated debates never erupt about Tamron v. Sigma? I'd like to see a battle over the most mediocre, hohum lens.

There are no heated debates because, unlike common (as muck) purist Canon/Nikon/Sony shooters - Sigma users are refined and respectable photographers.

 

[MLeeK]

^^ notice heated debates never erupt about Tamron v. Sigma? I'd like to see a battle over the most mediocre, hohum lens.

There are no heated debates because, unlike common (as muck) purist Canon/Nikon/Sony shooters - Sigma users are refined and respectable photographers.

Far above stooping to their level.

 

[DiskoJoe]

Notice he's using an a900, and not an slt.

Notice that the very first FF SLT just came out this month (or last month)?

The A900 is the only Sony i would have

The a900 is a nice motor. My buddies at the Houston Press all upgraded to the a99 for their concert work. So far they have said its pretty nice.

 

[DiskoJoe]

^^ notice heated debates never erupt about Tamron v. Sigma? I'd like to see a battle over the most mediocre, hohum lens.

Vivitar, rokinon or bower all have equally sh!tty stuff on the market these days!

These are pretty good lenses except they are manual focus only. IQ is pretty good for the price. Who else sells a 85mm f1.4 for less then $300?

 

[rexbobcat]

^^ notice heated debates never erupt about Tamron v. Sigma? I'd like to see a battle over the most mediocre, hohum lens.

Vivitar, rokinon or bower all have equally sh!tty stuff on the market these days!

Really? I thought the 14mm f/2.8 was pretty good. It has incredibly high resolution for the price of $400. But it does have a good amount of weird distortion. Although it can be corrected for the most part.

 

[fractionofasecond]

I think a Sony is better than shooting a wedding with an iPhone. An Entire Wedding Shot On An iPhone And Processed Using Instagram | Fstoppers

Now THAT is the definition of a low budget wedding.

Not to mention it was processed with Instagram, jesus christ what is this world coming to?

 

[fractionofasecond]

And check out that high ISO performance, basically no noise! Brilliant! I think we should all ditch the SLR's and just use iPhones!