For those playing at home, here is one of the posts that was considered harsh and the OP's response to it was deleted:
I jump in on the not caring for it camp. I don't think the tree adds anything to the image, and I rarely find shots of the back of people to be very emotive at all. At first look, I thought the edging around the tulips was a bear trap, which made me look more closely at that to realize what it was. That means that stuff is a distraction.
It's all pretty much my opinion isn't it? Is it really that harsh? Is it harsh to the OP simply because it's the OP's precious daughter and he has a connection to the image that no other viewer will have. I will say it again, as it applies to all any image like this,
I rarely find shots of the back of people to be very emotive. There is nothing for
for me in this image that suggests she is sad.
To me, she is simply looking down. A suggestive title doesn't change that. It is also
my opinion that a successful image should be able to stand alone without a title. Isn't that the goal of photography? To tell a story with imagery?
Anyhow, the point is, to hold every single member to a standard as high as a professional is a bit counter-productive.Not everyone has professional experience under their belt. It's a bit disheartening and honestly very unmotivating after receiving such a harsh critique. If you're gonna give someone a critique, rather than completely ripping the picture in two, try to ATLEAST tell them what they are doing right, as well as doing wrong.
What standard should be applied? The standard of amateurs that dont understand composition and visual language? It's funny that so many people flock here
wanting the opinions of professionals and want to hear how they can improve, wanting to learn about composition from someone who has a firm grasp of it. It's at the sole discretion of the person posting the image what to take from the comments. This place is interesting in that people continually whine that they don't get enough comments, or that they don't like the comments, or that they weren't given in a particularly pleasing way. It's also very interesting to see the ignorance of people who really don't know anything coming here to learn, to say that they know better. To post someone elses
opinion from another forum, is pretty meaningless. Who are they? What are their credentials? By being combative with a differing
opinion, you will only stack the deck in your favor. When others see differing opinions are unwelcome, they will refuse to comment on future posts, and your learning is hampered by that.
I believe many people come on here that think their sh!t smells sweeter than most and just tears down everyone's work except for their little cliques. Those clicks sit around in a circle and pat each other on the back. That's how I've see it. I've done a little digging.
You know what, there
ARE better photographers here than the majority of members. You need to accept that, and maybe learn from them. But if you can't, then you won't learn. What you see, with your "digging" may not be a complete picture, and it's pretty obvious, not very objective. A beginners forum, where a majority of the images posted are pretty much less than awesome, will obviously have more negative comments than glowing reviews. It's not rocket science. Glowing reviews can be had in barrels from Facebook, Flickr, Friends, and Family. The four F's! Your digging also failed you, because the "clique" has no problem letting another know when their images aren't strong. Speaking of cliques, I see two of them, one clique cannot accept negative responses, and thus recieves fewer comments, and the other clique recieves negative comments well, thus they will recieve more comments. Dig further and you will see that.
Honestly, I'd prefer you not comment on my work at all if you have nothing to say that will lets me know what I'm doing right as well as wrong. I don't want kittens and teddy bears, but I'm just starting out, and I have people telling me one thing and then I got people telling me another. Who do I believe? I don't know who is right and who is wrong. It's very confusing to say the least.
This is exactly the point I made above. What if you didn't do anything right? What if your composition is lacking, your focus is soft, it's under exposed, and the subject is lacking? What good is there to talk about? Should everyone just not comment? Who do you believe? Who is right and who is wrong? No one and everyone! You need to take all the comments
(opinions) and process them yourself. Really think about them. OBJECTIVELY, removing any attachment you have to the subject. That's not so easy to do, is it? You need to take comments like "people shot from behind rarely convey emotion" and apply it to your images and other peoples images and decide how true it is for yourself. Find examples of when it actually works, and figure out why. None of this is so cut and dry that anyone here can give you definitive answers. You need to be able to actually discuss issues brought up, rather than getting mad and deleting your posts and sticking your head in the sand.
it's like having the expectations of a college student from someone in junior high. It's just not gonan happen unless they are some sort of child prodigy.
So how do you make someone strive to be better? Coddle them, or be harsh? From what I experienced in Uni, that is exactly what seperated the wheat from the chaff. Critiques were brutal! You either learned from it and strived to be better, or you ignored it, complained about it, and never got better. This is also why not everyone who sets out to be a great (anything) becomes great. Not all of the people who really strived to be better became better either. Who do you want to be taught by, the mediocre, or the successful.
I don't claim my work is great, but i don't think it's quite as bad as the three of you have made it out to be.
What if it is? Not being rude, and not saying it
is that bad, but seriously, what if it is? What do you do then?
I belong to 4+ forums, and this is the only place I received such harsh criticism.
What does that speak to? You can spin the data any way you feel most comfortable with.
Majority rules, or I've been lead to believe.
Depends on the majority. Is the majority MWC's? Or is the majority working pros?
If ten MWC's who advertise their services on Craiglist say this image is amazing, and one Zack Arias says the image is awful in every way...
Majority rules?
While it was very cute of you to post a big FVCK YOU to everyone, how about you own up to your own bad behaviour that extinguished any constructive discussion before you or Provo point fingers. Hmmm? This thread took the bad turn the minute you did that. Own it.