Stone Arch Bridge

[robb01]

 

[white]

The post-processing hurts my eyes.

 

[skieur]

The arch makes a good frame, although it is cropped too tightly. You are however from a compositional point-of-view, missinag a centre of interest with visual impact.

skieur

 

[robb01]

The post-processing hurts my eyes.

Your eyes must not be used to level of epicness found in the picture.

 

[white]

The post-processing hurts my eyes.

Your eyes must not be used to level of epicness found in the picture.

Yes, of course. Epic.

 

[Aerin328]

Good cropping / framing sir. I have to agree however that the post-processing is admittedly painful to look at... :/ Also would be much better with a defined focal point/ subject. Interesting though!

 

[JClishe]

I love the subject and composition. Post processed way too heavily though.

 

[darthbuck]

agreed on the post-processing. would be awesome to see the original, or less processed photo.

 

[robb01]

Here is the original:

 

[Geaux]

Maybe a happy medium between the two shots (OVERLY processed and original) woudl work the best.

 

[Capeesh]

Apoligies for butting in robb01, just thought I would share a stone bridge I snapped a year or two ago, in Carrbridge, up in the highlands of Scotland. Would you walk over this ?

 

[Jcampbelll]

The post-processing hurts my eyes.

Your eyes must not be used to level of epicness found in the picture.

Yes, of course. Epic.

I guess I'm not used to it either.

 

[GooniesNeverSayDie11]

I like the shot although maybe if it had just a little more of the water in it. I also think a much more simpler edit works well ( closer to the original ) Here is a rough one I did considering it was a low res file.


stonearchbridge by GooniesNeverSayDie11, on Flickr


A little heavy on the blacks I notice after upload, but you atleast get the idea...

 

[BuS_RiDeR]

Maybe a happy medium between the two shots (OVERLY processed and original) woudl work the best.

I agree... the OP is over-cooked...