Strange unintended effect

[Reece Man]

Took this photo at 20 seconds in the wind at 800ISO and f1.8. That's the exposure recipe for fuzzy but I didn't expect it to look so much like a painting.

 

[Reece Man]

I guess I should include the image haha

The internet messed the colors up but that's not the important part.

 

[Actinometro]

It looks like camera shaking or a too low speed !

 

[Robin Usagani]

Hey.. I kinda dig it. My guess is the vibration of the wind.

 

[D-B-J]

That's kinda cool.

 

[Reece Man]

Thanks, I thought it was kinda cool too. It could be camera shake. I just moved and left my good tripod back in Arizona. I'm going back to get the last of my stuff soon so I'll be back on my game.

 

[joealcantar]

Work it and print it and see if you like it , if so print and hang.
-
-
Shoot well, Joe

 

[shaqspear]

Really cool

 

[Bitter Jeweler]

Nothing wrong with working in the style of the 1920's. Of course, they were limited in sharpness. Photography today does not have to be all about how sharp an imageis for it to be a successful work of art. It is more difficult duplicating the effect in camera though.


The Gutenberg Project allows redistributing these images, as long as credit is given.