What's new

The BIG LIE.

I noticed when using CFL bulbs that they are really dependent upon the quality connection of the socket and how you use it .. if that makes any sense.

The ones that are in sockets that are loose tend to not last long at all, whereas the same ones in very sturdy sockets tend to last a long time.

I use one in my bathroom as a nightlight and is one 75% of the time (current one has been on for at least 1-1/2 years. It actually lasts longer than other ones that are in a ceiling fan sockets which is kinda loose. Also more than other bulbs which are not constantly on. So it could be a combination of how often your turn it on/off and the stable connection.

But .. I'll be testing a few LEDs soon as I bought some over the weekend.

My house electrical bill is from $80 to $110 per month, and a bit more in the summer with the A/C.
 
When I completed my first-floor bathroom about 6 years ago, I installed 60-watt incandescent bulbs in some recessed lighting fixtures. Of 7 fixtures, exactly NONE have burned out yet.

The halogen bulb in the fanlight had to be replaced last year at a cost of about 10$.
 
Back on topic, I've not had issues with most of mine, though I don't like them! Perhaps the 240V ones are better, and the duff ones down rated for the American market :)

In the bathroom & outside the life has proved to be shorter, possibly as they are turned on & off more often though moisture could also be the cause.

The LED lights I have are much better, but until recently haven't been available in the right fittings for my bathroom & outside light fittings.

I suspect in future I'll only get LED bulbs except for special purposes. LEDs wouldn't be suitable for the spectrometers at work!
Damn! For most of this post I thought you were still talking about lawyers!:02.47-tranquillity:
 
Here's a quote from a CNN article:

"Seventy-five- and 100-watt bulbs were already banned this year. The ban on production of 40 and 60-watt bulbs -- the most popular in the country -- kicks in as 2014 begins."

Read it here: Obit RIP light bulb - CNN.com

I selectively bolded the word "banned" so you'll be sure to notice it.

Please note: This story was not written by that extreme right-wing crazy network FAUX NEWS, but by your daily trusted, unimpeachable source; CNN (Clinton News Network).

You say "banned" your way, and I'll say BANNED my way.

Here's another link: (CNN again) Light bulb ban set to take effect - Dec. 13 2013

First, CNN spent how many months, three and one half?, almost 24/7 on a missing plane when there was absolutely nothing to report. Even going so far as to suggest possible alien abduction. CNN is struggling to survive and, what better way to get viewer response than throwing a fire bomb? Your concept of CNN says all I need to know about your way of discerning information. You prefer to have your house fire bombed.

No type of lamp was "banned". Energy efficiency rules were put in place. BIG DIFFERENCE, not big lie. It is now up to the manufacturers to either improve the efficiency of an incandescent lamp or to move on. They're still manufacturing the same lamps, you just can't get them sold to you at your local big box. Go complain to Home Depot, not a photography forum. Eventually, the "free market" will decide the fate of the incandescent lamp.

George W. Bush + free market. Get the connection?

Efficiency standards mean fewer resources are wasted on inefficient devices. Buy an LED for a few bucks and you'll see the difference.

So, why are you in favor of wasting energy?
 
Methinks the lady doth protest way too much!
 
I am more than a bit confused when I see people complaining about their freedoms being taken away because they can't find a 100 watt incandescent lamp in the local big box home improvement store. Congress isn't making the decision not to stock those lamps, the big box store is.
Here's a quote from a CNN article:

"Seventy-five- and 100-watt bulbs were already banned this year. The ban on production of 40 and 60-watt bulbs -- the most popular in the country -- kicks in as 2014 begins."

Read it here: Obit RIP light bulb - CNN.com

I selectively bolded the word "banned" so you'll be sure to notice it.

Please note: This story was not written by that extreme right-wing crazy network FAUX NEWS, but by your daily trusted, unimpeachable source; CNN (Clinton News Network).

You say "banned" your way, and I'll say BANNED my way.

Here's another link: (CNN again) Light bulb ban set to take effect - Dec. 13 2013

You need to read past the word you are looking for:

Further down the article restates:

Rest in peace.

This was no sudden death. The diagnosis came in years ago, in 2007, when President George W. Bush signed a law to replace standard incandescents with more efficient bulbs.
Much more. Only about 10% of the energy these traditional bulbs use is for light, the Environmental Protection Agency says.
Seventy-five- and 100-watt bulbs were already banned this year. The ban on production of 40 and 60-watt bulbs -- the most popular in the country -- kicks in as 2014 begins.
"There are 4 billion light bulb sockets in the U.S. and more than 3 billion of them still use the standard incandescent technology that hasn't changed much in 125 years," the EPA says. "A standard incandescent is only 10% efficient -- the other 90% of the electricity it uses is lost as heat."
It's the dawn of a new day. Taking over the limelight now: halogen bulbs, compact fluorescent bulbs, LED bulbs and high efficiency incandescents.

What has been banned is not incandescent bulbs but low efficiency bulbs that throw away 90% of the energy.
Transitioning to these will lower your energy bill, lower pollution and make us closer to energy independence.

You know what was invented about the time that electric bulbs were invented as they are now?
The first typewriter and coal-powered motorcycles.
Maybe its time for a change for society's benefit?
 
soufiej; when you get tired of swallowing the bovine excrement that the government is feeding you, you might want to get your head out of the trough and have a look around.

An agency can write a specification for a hammer that can only be met with a $300 custom hammer, and the $3 hammer that is commonly available will not meet the specifications.

Writing "guidelines" for energy efficiency in order that no incandescent lightbulb can ever comply is effectively banning the incandescent lightbulb.

So you go ahead and pollute the earth with mercury, and I'll continue to use whichever lightbulbs contain no hazardous materials.
 
Let me add my personal experience. First, I use CFLs in most of my house. I've found that the ones I use have a significantly longer lifespan than the incandescent bulbs I used to use. I've CFLs going on 10 years in some cases. And no, it hasn't all been the same brand. Meanwhile, we have floods in the kitchen that we have trouble finding CFLs for so we have to use incandescents for those. 8 different sockets spread over the kitchen ceiling and I replace 3-7 every year (and no, we don't leave our kitchen lights on a lot).

As for the argument that somehow this is a ban or a law, that's not quite accurate: What You Need to Know About the Lightbulb Law

As for me personally, I like having bulbs that aren't "hot" and I have plenty of orchids in my basement (plenty = 24, a mixture of Paphs, Brassias, Phalenopses, a Vanilla plant, a Jewel orchid and an Oncidium). So I have two full spectrum CFLs that I often keep going 20 hours a day sometimes in the winter when light is low.
 
If soufiej was to reread my OP he would find that I made no mention of any government banning incandescent bulbs. The Big Lie is that CFLs outlast incandescent bulbs by years not months but years. It was my earlier experience that led me to start dating them to confirm what I was sure of.

We had 5 Incandescent bulbs in our dinning room fixture that was used daily & after 30 years one burned out & because of the style I had to change them all because I could no longer get a matching one. Two of these bulbs are still in service aftermore than 40 years in other fixtures - here is one of them.

P3300002.webp


The end is marked 3000 hour, super bulb, 75 watt.
 
Yes, Ron, it's a better bulb, for sure, but unfortunately, we cannot buy them anymore.
 
I'm $8 poorer. Doubt this one last 8000 hours.

using tapatalk.
 
soufiej; when you get tired of swallowing the bovine excrement that the government is feeding you, you might want to get your head out of the trough and have a look around.

An agency can write a specification for a hammer that can only be met with a $300 custom hammer, and the $3 hammer that is commonly available will not meet the specifications.

Writing "guidelines" for energy efficiency in order that no incandescent lightbulb can ever comply is effectively banning the incandescent lightbulb.

So you go ahead and pollute the earth with mercury, and I'll continue to use whichever lightbulbs contain no hazardous materials.


I have to repeat, nothing has been "banned". You can still buy incandescent lamps if your store wants to carry them. Most won't because the manufacturer has moved on to a lamp technology with higher efficiency. That's what is being "mandated", higher efficiency lamps. If incandescent lamp technology were improved sufficiently to make the lamp fit into the efficiency standards set, then incandescent lamps would still be around in quantities. The manufacturers themselves effectively banned the incandescent lamp by saying it was more profitable to move to another technology. This is how things work, we moved from being an agricultural nation to being an industrialized nation because we followed technology. We moved from what at the time was unreliable electric power for our transportation to the technology with the highest return, petroleum. At the time we did so, energy was plentiful and cheap and we weren't paying money to countries who would prefer we went away. I remember when I was a little kid, we had friends from Texas who drove their Cadillac convertible with the top down and the AC on because gas was twenty two cents per gallon. Those days are gone. Moving forward is what technology does. The government did not build CFL's, the manufacturer did. I doubt you'll find a "Made in the USA" sticker on the CFL's since most are manufactured in China or some other third world country using cheap labor and cheap parts. I would be more upset about the fact we don't manufacturer most goods in the US today.

But "banning" and "phasing out" are two different things. Government also mandated against gasoline powered vehicles which produced major pollutants. That's bad? IMO I'm in favor of government doing what it does best, being a watchdog against industry where we have seen profit will often override public good. Government mandates how much arsenic can be in our water and food supplies? You want to eat and drink arsenic? Government is also mandating against the use of arsenic in "treated wood" products because it leeches into the water table. I just can't get upset about such mandates.

As to the mercury in a CFL, it is not an issue. Unless you want to make it an issue, which you can so you can get PO'd at government. Buy a LED or a halogen lamp. They contain no mercury. Recycle your CFL's so the minimal amount of mercury can be contained. However, I have to ask again, why are you in favor of wasting energy? If you're concerned about the miniscule amount of mercury in your CFL (which cannot escape unless you break the enclosure) but you're not concerned about the mercury and arsenic and other pollutants and carcinogens emitted by the coal burning power plant you are supporting and the rivers and streams being polluted by the coal companies as they top mountains, then, IMO, you've found the wrong dog to hunt with. If you really want to go find something to scare you or to make you mad, come to Dallas. We have at least eight radio channels turning out fear and anger 24/7. Though, you probably have just as many on the presets to your own radio.

*
Ron Evers said: "If soufiej was to reread my OP he would find that I made no mention of any government banning incandescent bulbs. The Big Lie is that CFLs outlast incandescent bulbs by years not months but years. It was my earlier experience that led me to start dating them to confirm what I was sure of.

We had 5 Incandescent bulbs in our dinning room fixture that was used daily & after 30 years one burned out & because of the style I had to change them all because I could no longer get a matching one. Two of these bulbs are still in service aftermore than 40 years in other fixtures - here is one of them."



We seem to have two different conversations going on in this thread. One is about "banning" incandescent lamps and the other is your contention CFL's are short lived. I have similar experiences with some incandescent lamps I have in two ceiling fixtures. They are both on dimmers so they don't get hit with 120VAC at start up and are often run well below their full output. These two techniques alone will extend the life of any incandescent lamp. I've probably changed two lamps in these (five lamps each) fixtures in 22 years since I run mostly floor and table lamps with CFL's and LED's. Several of the CFL's have been in place for five years or more and saved money in that time. I have no anecdotal evidence a CFL is more likely than an incandescent to burn out early. I assume you purchased early adapter CFL's. Made in China. Cheap labor and cheap parts. I can remember a time in the US when we complained about electronics coming from Japan. Now we sheepishly accept the fact virtually all of our electronics will come from China, India or Taiwan. Then we complain when they are substandard. Makes no sense to me.

I can't say I have any new CFL's. First, LED's provide a better, brighter light IMO and are coming down in cost. I've used halogens in many fixtures for the last fifteen years or so. And the CFL's I use have simply lasted. I remember the last batch of CFL's I purchased was something like three for $10 or so. Even if they didn't actually last longer than an incandescent lamp, they did use less energy so they paid for themself in short time.

So, Ron, I can't get on board with your complaint. You made the decision to buy these lamps. You received a $5 credit for replacements. The first set basically cost you little to nothing, right? For someone who dates their lamps, I'm a bit surprised you purchased lamps with no information regarding how to contact the manufacturer. The government had nothing to do with your decision to buy an unknown brand. I would say you wanted to save a few dollars so you bought the cheap Blue Planet, 9 watt lamp instead of a more well known name. Did you check before you purchased from an unknown company? If you didn't and you bought anyway, government had nothing to do with that either. Government had nothing to do with those lamps being manufactured in a third world country. But this is what I see from a lot of folks nowdays, find someone else to blame for their own problems. And government always ranks up there when you have so many highly paid corporate schills, talking heads and politicians telling you to distrust government. The more they get you riled up, the more their advertisers and contributors like it. So it clearly benefits them to be as outrageous as possible.

You can certainly be upset if that's what you prefer. I prefer to be a bit more rational and look at the experiences I have with lowering my energy bill, not contributing to the destruction of the planet, not giving profit to those manufacturers moving US jobs overseas and selling lower quality products hoping most of us just won't complain. I just can't see that one or two lamps, either CFL or incandescent is sufficient evidence to make your point. I'm just not seeing hundreds of users posting complaints about their CFL's breaking. Things do break. All things eventually break. And some things last when they are taken care of.

If you consistently have problems with CFL's in one outlet or on one circuit, you might want to have your service panel checked. Most modern communities now suffer from numerous over and under Voltage conditions all day, everyday. Surges occur when appliances in your house - and actually in your neighbor's house too since you all share a common power source - power up and down and these large Voltage/Amperage draws will shorten the life of all electronic devices using the circuit. Possibly, rather than complaining about a defective CFL, you might benefit from a while house surge protector and a good, solid true Earth ground.
 
What You Need to Know About the Lightbulb Law

"Consider that a typical 60-watt incandescent bulb emits about 900 lumens of light, which comes to approximately 15 lumens per watt of electricity. The new standard requires bulbs to produce at least 20 lumens of light per watt; by 2020 that number rises to 45 lumens per watt. A current CFL will do 50 lumens per watt or more,.."

Why, imagine that! The poor old lightbulb is JUST UNDER the new standard. Aww... Too bad, so sad.

Oh, but look! Those CFL bulbs actually DO meet the new standards. Wow! What luck! How fortunate for them!

"CFLs represent the best value for consumers, as they use one-fourth the power of a comparable incandescent lightbulb and last up to 10 times longer. As a result, each CFL will save the consumer at least $30 in the form of lower electricity costs over the life of the bulb."

Except if they don't then; Aww.. too bad, so sad.
 
:popcorn:
 
What You Need to Know About the Lightbulb Law

"Consider that a typical 60-watt incandescent bulb emits about 900 lumens of light, which comes to approximately 15 lumens per watt of electricity. The new standard requires bulbs to produce at least 20 lumens of light per watt; by 2020 that number rises to 45 lumens per watt. A current CFL will do 50 lumens per watt or more,.."

Why, imagine that! The poor old lightbulb is JUST UNDER the new standard. Aww... Too bad, so sad.

Oh, but look! Those CFL bulbs actually DO meet the new standards. Wow! What luck! How fortunate for them!

"CFLs represent the best value for consumers, as they use one-fourth the power of a comparable incandescent lightbulb and last up to 10 times longer. As a result, each CFL will save the consumer at least $30 in the form of lower electricity costs over the life of the bulb."

Except if they don't then; Aww.. too bad, so sad.


As Forrest says, "Stupid is as Stupid does."

:BangHead:
 

Most reactions

Back
Top Bottom