The technical elements of the movie making was nothing short of superb. Period authenticity is spot on and the actions of the actors were quite realistic.
Gary's Disappointment:
Dunkirk is not only a key pivot point for WWII, but also historically significant in a political history of man and significant in a war history of man. History notwithstanding, Dunkirk is an incredible story, in and of itself.
To me, it is the size, breadth and scope of Dunkirk which is the story. An entire British army (BEF) plus French, Polish and Belgian forces, were surrounded, holed up and squeezed into this little French seaside village. The Germans outmanned them, out gunned them, out fightered and bombered them and most importantly out armored them. The Germans thought it was just a matter of time, the Allies were trapped and even dropped leaflets printed in English and French with a map of the situation, indicating that there was no hope for an escape and to surrender.
The Germans never took into account this, gritty seafaring island of a nation, giving a call to all civilians to volunteer and rescue the army on the verge of destruction across the channel. By God, the Brits answered that call, in trawlers, ferries, yachts and anything that could float across the channel ... they came and they rescued their own BEF plus another 130,000 of the Allies. 330,000 men in all.
For Gary, the sheer scope of the operation and the grit of the British people, each thinking that individually, they could make a difference, that their fishing boat or yacht could save and army ... For Gary, that is the story of Dunkirk. Dunkirk is the story of an entire people, a story of collective resolve and action. The movie, while an excellent movie, did not capture Gary's vision of the event. It told a realistic story of three individual, but the story is of the collective, off 400,000+ soldiers on the edge of annihilation, of a handful of fighters defending the channel and beaches from waves of German aircraft and of a gritty, stubborn people ... overcoming their fears of war ... without wavering piling into their tiny little boats, time and time again ... they rescue their army.
The movie only showed glimpses of the scope of the battle, the number of the rescued, the collective courage of the civilians and the size of the rescue armada. That is where Gary's disappointment lies.
(It is like making a documentary of the Caribou migration, herds of tens of thousand of Caribou marching across the tundra to their spring calving grounds ... Caribou stretching from horizon to horizon ... but only filming two or three of the beasts.)
@Gary A My friend, I believe we will have to agree to disagree in regards to Dunkirk. I found the movie to be quite enjoyable. The weakest part of the plot was the "survival story" of the initial character. Hollywood always has to have something like that. As for the rest, very good and quite realistic in terms of attitudes and actions all the way around. The Luftwaffe's bombing was a bit too accurate perhaps in the movie, but overall it was as good of depiction of one of the greatest military Cluster Flucks in history, modern or ancient. Only Lee's battle plan at Gettysburg, Picketts Charge in particular, comes close.