Frank F.
engineering art
- Joined
- Oct 24, 2016
- Messages
- 2,022
- Reaction score
- 1,081
- Location
- Bonn
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos OK to edit
@Frank: Airtight doesn't work with small structures like homes. Energy efficiency has been a big thing since the 1960's here in California. One construction company built "airtight" homes which could be heated seemingly with a single match. But the odors and smells from cooking simply made the houses uninhabitable. Tyvek, (or equal), is standard construction material on all government facilities. Those thin, fiber-ish, large mail envelopes that you can't rip open with your bare hands ... that's Tyvek. The US has construction companies which have qualified by our EPA as ESCO companies. ESCO is an Energy Service Company. ESCO's bring in all the disciplines of construction, engineering and energy management, from landscaping to insulation to solar to et cetera, in order to construct building with the smallest energy footprint. It is a comprehensive approach to construction and retrofitting. Example: Planting trees is specific areas will reduce the need of mechanical cooling or LED w/sensors will reduce the number of solar panels.
Our government will issue Requests For Proposals which can only be bid upon by an ESCO.
Typically, an ESCO contract requires the ESCO company to pay for their portion of the construction/retrofitting and the ESCO company gets paid back over time through the energy savings. Example: If it costs $100 a month to heat/cool/vent/power/light the facility and the ESCO can reduce the costs to $60 a month. Then the ESCO captures and pockets the $40 difference, until the contract is fulfilled.
Gary has worked with ESCO type contracts with hospitals, schools and military facilities. Gary has seen the payments amortized for as little as three years to as long as 12 years.
The ESCO business model seems to make a lot of sense. In the entrepreneur unfriendly environment in Germany people are more into following the flow of government money than to make up their mind and do what is right instead.
Air tight works well with modern non draft air management systems, the air is replaced with outside air up to 18 times a day. If the air outside does not bring in odours you will have no problems with odours. Most of the movement can be initiated passively.
But: the materials used here remind me of a shoe box with double walls stuffed with insulation material between them "stone wool" is a good material. This whole construction is energy saving but not at all sustainable. I guess these houses will last 40 years maximum, in case of water penetration these constructions can be lost for good.
They are also often covered by monopitch roofs with aluminium cladding, prone to electrochemical destruction ... One thing leads to another. The systems are often very complex meaning lots of failure points.
I try to make my house sustainable, it shall last for 100 years at least, even if the latest and greatest energy savings are not to be achieved that way. It will be a breathing construction.