Agree with the above. You must have a reason for taking a photograph. Otherwise, it's still just a snapshot. Doesn't matter what time of day it was taken.
It's very possible the subject looked interesting to you in the real world of standing in the spot where you took the shot. There are plenty of subjects which look interesting in person and yet do not translate well when they are confined to a frame.
There are several reasons for this; first, dynamic range perceived by your eye/mind cognition doesn't always translate into an interesting photo due to the limitations of a digital camera.
Often, the subject you put in the frame has no context. What looks good in the whole of the scene you are viewing does not translate into an interesting subject when all the rest has been removed.
If you were interested in the fog rising off the water, it gets lost in the intrusive foreground. Nothing in the shot says. "Woah! cool frickin' fog!"
Technically, I can't see a reason for the higher ISO or the shutter speed.
You have the major line of the photo running through the center of the image. That's acceptable if it works for the image. IMO it doesn't work here. Use lines and patterns to direct the viewer's eye to other areas of the photo they can explore at their leisure. The more the viewer's eye moves around to find something new and interesting, the better your photo in most cases.
A personal thing for me, your shot has been taken from a standing position. How many shots do you suppose get taken from a standing position?
Too many, IMO.
Change your perspective and you'll adjust our interest in your image simply because we see so many photos taken from a standing position. We want to see stuff we normally don't. Or, at least generic stuff from an unusual perspective.
