- Joined
- Jun 7, 2012
- Messages
- 15,485
- Reaction score
- 7,878
- Location
- Central Florida
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos NOT OK to edit
- Moderator 🛠️
- #16
I am not going to argue with the obvious part, regarding the difference of opinions. But you have stated that if he cropped the botttom half and left just the motorcyclist and arrows, it would be "a far more interesting shot". I was just wondering why? Why would it be far more interesting? I think it is a legitimate question.
are you looking for some technical or artistic definition for why it would be better as defined in some textbook? i don't understand why I cant just feel that this picture doesn't do anything for me and I would have liked it more shot a different way for no other reason that that's what i felt when I looked at it. Its just the vibe i got.
I don't have any particular reason except that I dont really find this shot all that interesting, and I think i would have liked it shot the way I suggested.
Also, I didn't say just to crop the bottom half, I said to have shot the picture with the motorcycle AND rider in the frame, whereas the picture would be the motorcycle, rider, lanes, and arrows...just minus the tree branch.
you might as well ask me why I like chocolate ice cream better than vanilla. Or why I think German shepherds are cuter than Pugs.
maybe it IS a legitimate question, but i am not entirely sure what sort of answer you are looking for.
I don't have any math equations or photographic "rules" to throw at you as to why I feel the way I do about this picture.
I only know that I don't find this particular picture appealing, and if shot the way I suggested, I think i would have.
I obviously can not say that with 100% certainty, since I cant actually see the picture the way I envisioned it.
I hope I have managed to answer your question to your satisfaction...I don't know how else to explain it.
It was just my "instinct" maybe? or, "gut feeling"? I dunno. its just how I feel when I look at the picture.