You definitely would have been invited. Your Google+ conspiracy theory made me assume you would not be interested.I just want to point out that - as a mod - I expect to be invited to this inner circle and their discussions. I don't have Google + and I won't be getting it, but I still demand the invite and full logs of the conversations.....

You definitely would have been invited. Your Google+ conspiracy theory made me assume you would not be interested.I just want to point out that - as a mod - I expect to be invited to this inner circle and their discussions. I don't have Google + and I won't be getting it, but I still demand the invite and full logs of the conversations.....![]()
No, it means he was being facetious, since he loathes Google. However, for what its worth, had he shown interest, he would have been invited. The circle is on and is growing albeit a bit slower than expected.You definitely would have been invited. Your Google+ conspiracy theory made me assume you would not be interested.I just want to point out that - as a mod - I expect to be invited to this inner circle and their discussions. I don't have Google + and I won't be getting it, but I still demand the invite and full logs of the conversations.....![]()
You state "WOULD have been invited".. does this mean that your Google+ Circle plans are off... or ??![]()

What the hell is going on in here?
Seriously does anybody really use Google +. I've had it but I don't really tune in to the network as I searched for friends or clients and I don't seem to find a significant number them, so I deemed it useless for now or or until it hits the snowball fan.
Is the initiation to the club better then ten paddles wacks to the upper rear thigh?
Seriously does anybody really use Google +?
Exactly. The only problem it causes, is if you are a photographer that needs to grant EXCLUSIVE rights to a photo. This may create a bit of a problem. I think that a way around this (I am pretty sure anyway ) would be to link to the image. Typically when you link to an image it will show the image in an extra large page preview thumbnail. Then if someone clicks it, they can see the enlarged image.Seriously does anybody really use Google +?
lots of amazing photographers are using it
I couldn't fine this part of the TOS in the previous 7 pages but I did skim....
11.1 You retain copyright and any other rights you already hold in Content which you submit, post or display on or through, the Services. By submitting, posting or displaying the content you give Google a perpetual, irrevocable, worldwide, royalty-free, and non-exclusive license to reproduce, adapt, modify, translate, publish, publicly perform, publicly display and distribute any Content which you submit, post or display on or through, the Services. This license is for the sole purpose of enabling Google to display, distribute and promote the Services and may be revoked for certain Services as defined in the Additional Terms of those Services.
On the contrary, I think this thread has been one big paddle whack on me....No matter how much you bump it you won't be getting any paddle whacks from here -- you'll have to get those in your Inner Circle![]()
