(Ghastly) Krueger
TPF Noob!
- Joined
- Feb 20, 2006
- Messages
- 1,393
- Reaction score
- 0
- Location
- Lost between tomorrow and yesterday
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos OK to edit
I got the advice to go back to basics and keep it simple.
One of the books I have on photography gives small assignments to build skills. I thought I'd follow some of them.
One of the first assignments is "shape". The 3d shape of an object should be accurately represented in 2d... or something like that.
Of the series of pics I took, this is the one I like most. I think the part of 3d shape is covered, but beyond that?
Do you think the composition is ok?
I underexposed it on purpose to avoid overblowing the brighter areas. It is a bit dark, but I like the tones. Please critique the exposure as well.
Camera make: Konica Minolta Camera, Inc.
Camera model: DiMAGE Xg
Resolution: 768 x 1024
Color/bw: Black and white
Flash used: No
Focal length: 10.4mm (35mm equivalent: 67mm)
Exposure time: 0.033 s (1/30)
Aperture: f/3.1
ISO equiv.: 100
Exposure bias: -0.70
Whitebalance: Auto
Metering Mode: matrix
Exposure: program (auto)
One of the books I have on photography gives small assignments to build skills. I thought I'd follow some of them.
One of the first assignments is "shape". The 3d shape of an object should be accurately represented in 2d... or something like that.
Of the series of pics I took, this is the one I like most. I think the part of 3d shape is covered, but beyond that?
Do you think the composition is ok?
I underexposed it on purpose to avoid overblowing the brighter areas. It is a bit dark, but I like the tones. Please critique the exposure as well.
Camera make: Konica Minolta Camera, Inc.
Camera model: DiMAGE Xg
Resolution: 768 x 1024
Color/bw: Black and white
Flash used: No
Focal length: 10.4mm (35mm equivalent: 67mm)
Exposure time: 0.033 s (1/30)
Aperture: f/3.1
ISO equiv.: 100
Exposure bias: -0.70
Whitebalance: Auto
Metering Mode: matrix
Exposure: program (auto)