Pallycow
TPF Noob!
- Joined
- Nov 16, 2012
- Messages
- 1,697
- Reaction score
- 520
- Location
- United States
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos OK to edit
More fails from me. I tried another new type of lighting and didn't do well.
I had light above camera...about a foot higher than camera, maybe...reflector pretty much in her lap...angled to fill on face accordingly. Metered at 5.6.
Heavy shadow under eyes...made bags look worse than they really are. It just looks bad to me, overall. Or is it ok and I'm just tired?
My assessment is camera too high, and no light on backdrop really visible. I'm not sure why but I chose to meter that at 2.8 for some reason. I guess I thought it would be more visible than it came out. Other than those two things, I dunno.
The whole thing is appearing underexposed to me, but I metered light at 5.6 and camera was like 3 feet away from her face...if even that far. So it's not technically underexposed...but it's looking like it...I think. I dunno...I"m sleepy. lol
Here is a single shot, and a couple shot using same lighting.
Is it just that simple...those two things F'ed up my 'vision', or am I missing something else?
No PP really to speak of...just slight wb adjust, raw to jpg, etc. Didn't bother finalizing as I just wanted feedback before I spent any real time on them.
Thanks.
I had light above camera...about a foot higher than camera, maybe...reflector pretty much in her lap...angled to fill on face accordingly. Metered at 5.6.
Heavy shadow under eyes...made bags look worse than they really are. It just looks bad to me, overall. Or is it ok and I'm just tired?
My assessment is camera too high, and no light on backdrop really visible. I'm not sure why but I chose to meter that at 2.8 for some reason. I guess I thought it would be more visible than it came out. Other than those two things, I dunno.
The whole thing is appearing underexposed to me, but I metered light at 5.6 and camera was like 3 feet away from her face...if even that far. So it's not technically underexposed...but it's looking like it...I think. I dunno...I"m sleepy. lol
Here is a single shot, and a couple shot using same lighting.
Is it just that simple...those two things F'ed up my 'vision', or am I missing something else?
No PP really to speak of...just slight wb adjust, raw to jpg, etc. Didn't bother finalizing as I just wanted feedback before I spent any real time on them.
Thanks.