Thoughts on NIKON 35mm 1.8 lens?

Thanks That is what I read in the book Understanding Exposure , the author recommend to use f5.6
 
Why would people spend $5299 on a 200/2 instead of $2399 on a 70-200/2.8? Is it really that good?
 
RichardsTPF said:
Why would people spend $5299 on a 200/2 instead of $2399 on a 70-200/2.8? Is it really that good?

Primes are usually better.
 

Most reactions

Back
Top