jfrabat
No longer a newbie, moving up!
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2012
- Messages
- 595
- Reaction score
- 60
- Location
- Panama, Central America
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos OK to edit
Look into contrast detect versus phase detection AF. Look at lens maximum aperture values. Look at the size of AF motors and relative torque. Look at the number of AF points and whether they are cross-type sensors, or not. Look at the price of a top-level Canon or Nikon flagship camera ($6995 or so) versus an $800-$1400 body. And so on and so on. Look at Nikon's almost two decade lead in using color-value, distance-aware, and light reflectance analysis value metering technology (and Canon's newer system that ALSO uses color-aware subject mapping) and you'll see that there is a LOT of behind the scenes technology that the "other" camera makers do not have access to due to intellectual property.
Nikon's 3-D Color Matrix technology is something they invented years ago. It took Canon over 15 years to figure out a way around Nikon's intellectual property on focusing and metering--and Canon did that by developing a FOUR-color system, to increase their AF system's performance and metering reliability. In Japan, the amount of yellow present in greens is a type of "color"; Nikon used red-green-blue only, the 3 in 3-D Color Aware. Canon finally got a patented system that now makes their cameras no longer "color-blind", and it has proven to be a HUGE success in the new 5D Mark III, a camera that earlier in version I and II, had a particularly weak AF system. Now, with this new technology, it utterly kicks ass. Canon has a 20-year lead on Sony at making 35mm-srtyle SLR cameras.
Sony is an electronics maker that happens to make a few cameras. Nikon and Canon have been developing AF cameras for professional-level uses since the mid-1980's. Pick up a camera like a Nikon D3-series or a Canon 1D series, or a 5D Mark III. Those are Maserati's.
But if you wnt a fair comparison, you should not compare a mirrorless camera to a DSLR... in that case, you have to compare those high end Nikon and Canon to the A99 (or the newer A77 MKII if you want to talk about a crop sensor)... and both of those are rather fast focusing cameras. In fact, because of the translucent mirror, they can track better thn Nikon or Canon while shooting because only the Sony can continue to focus WHILE shooting!
And I dont think it is fair to say that Sony is an electonic maker that happens to make cameras... If you look at the last few years, most of the innovations in cameras have come from Sony, including those found in other brands (remmber how the D800 as a big deal because it was the firt 36MP DSLR? Was that not a Sony sensor in there?). I am not saying that one brand is better than another, but all have their strength adn weakness... I just feel that tracking and fast focus are actually Sony's strength (talking about the SLT cameras here, not the A7).