- Joined
- Jun 7, 2012
- Messages
- 15,469
- Reaction score
- 7,848
- Location
- Central Florida
- Website
- www.flickr.com
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos NOT OK to edit
What is the air speed velocity of a coconut laden swallow?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
What is the air speed velocity of a coconut laden swallow?
What is the air speed velocity of a coconut laden swallow?
Too fast for HSS of course
Ballistics you do realise this thread is an extension of a critique thread. Furthermore why is it bad that we are discussing a core process of the photography world? The debate and discussion on HSS is very valid.
If you're concerned that critique isn't enough, well, only thing you can do is right that problem yourself. Well thought out and constructive critique given encourages it further.
No, it only has to do with the number of pixels that the object takes up in the final image. And the number of pixels that it moves over the course of the light exposure. Macro vs. not macro, lens focal length, etc. etc. should all just be intermediate details that get you in different ways to what matters: pixels in size and pixels of movement in terms of the final image.Gavjenks, i agree with you 100% about the pixel blur. But do you also agree with me if it was shot with macro, it would have been ok too?
Fair enough. You're right, I don't have a strong grasp on it, and it doesn't really matter for the thread, so okay, I give up on that, with more than one person disagreeing.[being too adamant about gravity stuff, something something, the quote is on a different page]
Derrel, just because all the experts use longer exposure and instantaneous flash in a dark room, that doesn't necessarily imply that a shutter wouldn't be POSSIBLE.Again: the true experts in the field realize that the camera's shutter is far too slow to stop water droplet motion.
Ballistics you do realise this thread is an extension of a critique thread. Furthermore why is it bad that we are discussing a core process of the photography world? The debate and discussion on HSS is very valid.
If you're concerned that critique isn't enough, well, only thing you can do is right that problem yourself. Well thought out and constructive critique given encourages it further.