Please explain "This is because young people are so insecure as a result of poor self image from the media." ?
The media has poor self image? :scratch:
Or you're saying the media is causing young people to have a poor self image?
You know, Photoshop is just a digital darkroom. Photographs used by the media have been altered to make the people in them look spectacular for about 100 years now. Before Photoshop they just did it in a wet darkroom.
Not that you need any persuasion for the second one, but take a look at these:
See Link:
http://i.cdn.turner.com/sivault/si_online/covers/images/1961/0213_large.jpg
And Link:
http://i.cdn.turner.com/sivault/si_online/covers/images/2010/0212_large.jpg
(Both images sourced from sportsillustrated.cnn.com)
So as you can see women have have become much more sexy over the past half a century...
...where was I going?
Back on topic. The first image is from Febuary, 1961. The second is from Febuary last year. The first, being produced before digital photography was invented, is obviously shot with film. The second photo is obviously digital, and there were probably more hours of Photoshop put into this shot than into the creation of the model's fake breasts.
But what I want everyone to get from this is that you can see how the idea of a "perfect body" and a "perfect shot" has evolved over time. In the first image, it's not a big deal that the subject's face looks oddly contorted, or that her hair is messy. But in the second shot, everything is perfect. Absolutely perfect. If you can find a flaw in that image, post it up.
The rolemodels of soceity, sports players, models, what have you, are perfect. Their beauty is often more than what is physically possible, and is a result of advancements in image manipulation that has only been around the last couple of decades or so.