Well, yes, I tend to agree that the colour of her anorak, of the atmosphere (you say it was at sunset time), of her hair, of the dry grass she's sitting on, of her little cold nose and her cold fingers all add to the impression that there is too much red to be seen. But I tend to believe that all that red simply WAS there when you took the photo.
The foot is whole in the original?
Not sure about the rose pic.
The detail is there in the flower, but the background is blurred to extremes in comparion. I have made a whole picture series with a full-colour subject and half-desaturated backgrounds, so I like the technique, but somehow here I don't ... can't tell why.