Which looks more sensuous?

[jamesbjenkins]

Either #1 or #2. I think you need to stop down a full stop or so. The DoF is almost too small to appreciate all the detail. If you post some/all of these as a set, a consistent WB and tone would help a lot.

Nice shots!

 

[ZapoTeX]

My favorite is the first, total sharpness!
3,4 and 5 look a tiny little bit soft and 2 the part of the flower in the foreground is slightly OOF...

Great job, congratulations!

 

[Frequency]

Either #1 or #2. I think you need to stop down a full stop or so. The DoF is almost too small to appreciate all the detail. If you post some/all of these as a set, a consistent WB and tone would help a lot.

Nice shots!

Thank you very much James; points are noted

 

[Frequency]

My favorite is the first, total sharpness!
3,4 and 5 look a tiny little bit soft and 2 the part of the flower in the foreground is slightly OOF...

Great job, congratulations!

Thank you Zapo very much indeed

 

[Rick58]

For me it's #5 hands down. I really like it as is. you could try lightening it a touch, but I'm afraid it may lose something.

 

[Frequency]

For me it's #5 hands down. I really like it as is. you could try lightening it a touch, but I'm afraid it may lose something.

Thank you very much, Rick... i am afraid to make a touch too....

 

[Frequency]

By the way, is every body watching Olympic ceremony?