Trever1t
Been spending a lot of time on here!
- Joined
- Dec 30, 2010
- Messages
- 9,331
- Reaction score
- 2,722
- Location
- San Jose, CA
- Website
- wsgphotography.com
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos NOT OK to edit
_POR0140-Edit by WSG Photography, on Flickr
Observations: Having used the 85f1.4G predominantly for the last year or so, I found the 135f2 to be rather different. Not as razor sharp like the 85, with a particular softness, not out of focus softness but a smoother transition from focus point to the OOF areas.
My copy does seem to have a very exaggerated front focus issue. I have the AF fine tune set to +20 and at least on the chart, at close range it's acceptable. In real use, at least with the sample above, it's tack sharp at F2.
I really haven't had much use of it yet but I think it feels like an old LP in comparison to a modern CD. There is something lost with today's modern digital systems. Rendition may be better, clearer, more consice but some ambiance I think is given up.
Your thoughts on the image and the lens?
2)
_POR0364-Edit by WSG Photography, on Flickr
Last edited: