- Joined
- Oct 3, 2013
- Messages
- 11,518
- Reaction score
- 4,788
- Location
- Louisville, Nebraksa - United States
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos OK to edit
I know what you mean. At the moment I'm working with a 70-300 mm Nikon lens, it's been getting the job done so far but I'm still trying to decide if I'll get more bang for my buck out of the next lens with something faster (F/2.8 200 mm zoom) or something with more reach (Originally I was looking at either a 400 mm or 500 mm lens). I can see advantages to both, and eventually I'd like to have both but my progression back into the world of cameras is going to be a matter of slowly and steady rebuilding my equipment list.
The 70-200 can't beat the 70-300 at the 300mm end, even with a Nikon TC. Been there, tried that.
Well curiously enough I just purchased a 70-200 - but my desire for it was not based on the maximum focal length of 200 mm but rather it's aperture of F/2.8. I won't be using a teleconverter with it, but for my daughters sports stuff indoors and to walk around some of the places at the local zoo such as the Lied Jungle or the Desert Dome where the lighting conditions can get pretty poor rather quickly, I think it will end up being a very good addition to my bag.
As it so happens I got a deal that was way, way to good to pass up. The lens is a Sigma with the OS feature, and my winning bid was $721.50. Couldn't walk away from a deal like that, in fact I'm still pinching myself wondering how on earth a lens like that went that cheap on Ebay. But sometimes you just get lucky I guess.


