The color rendering in #1 and #2 looks really funky to me. Sort of vintage, maybe?
#3 makes no sense at all to me. I see a mess of tropes thrown at a candid. Is it supposed to be photojournalistic? They why have you got the low contrast glowy effect? Honestly it doesn't look like a keeper at all, to me.
#4 are those the same shoes? Pick a color rendition and stick with it. I like the warmer one. Also, is this a product shoot, or a wedding shoot? See also #7.
#5 is a couple of charming portraits, the one on the right being a little too contrasty, which is unflattering, I think.
#6 I'm with Robin, the b&w mixed in doesn't fit. Also, all three images feel tilted to the left so the whole page wants to fall over. Not sure if that layout is just for showing us here, though.
#7 Product shots.. what? Maybe this is a thing in weddings now, though? They're not badly done as product shots, but you seem to have a problem with tilts to the left throughout.
#8 I kinda dig it. That's a nice environmental image, a little moment in time. Nice.
That's kinda bitchy sounding, I know. Sorry. I'm not a wedding guy, and there's a lot of stuff in contemporary wedding photography that makes me itch. It's a wedding, she looks beautiful, she is surrounded by beautiful things and your photographs DO show all that, which is really the point. I'm not sure that you're getting quite a coherent look here, your contrast seems all over the place, and you're sometimes using the soft glowy thing and sometimes not. The colors are sometimes more popped than at other times, but that's a subtle effect. Organize the work appropriately and all will be fine, I predict.
I would definitely dump #3, though.