I totally agree.
It is the photographer that makes the photo.
The camera and lens are just the photographers tools, just like a carpenter or mechanic has a tool box of tools.
This was put into my face in high school, when we with the SLRs were outclassed by a couple students with "Instamatics" (Kodak's box camera of the day). It was the eye and skill of the photographer, not the equipment that made the prize winning images. We just did not have the "eye" that those two students did.
Even today, there are those with a great eye, who can look at a scene and in 15 seconds, get a great shot.
Whereas I have to look and study the scene for a LONG time "trying" to figure out how to get a good shot. I freely admit that I do not have that eye. So while I can do it, it takes me much longer and a lot more work to do. And I likely am still be behind the person with the good eye.
However, as he said, like a carpenter, you need the right tools to do the tasks. So it is with camera gear.
- Adams did not shoot football with a 11 x 14 view camera, like I do with a dSLR. The big view camera is just the wrong tool.
- You can't use a 18-55 and crop DEEP, when you really need a 300mm lens, and still have to crop.
- When I shoot volleyball in the gym. The autofocus update of a 1970s technology 50/1.8 prime work just as well today as a 50/1.8 did back then. And it beats the pants off a slow 18-55/3.5-5.6 that you have to shoot at ISO 25600. The old saying of the past, is just as true today as it was back then, "in low light FAST glass wins."
Pick the right tool for the job, and the job is easier to do.