What's new

Your goal?

Well, when I had to take intro photography a couple semesters ago for my Fine Arts BA degree, we had to shoot photos in the style of a photographer. I chose Wolfgang Tillmans.

It was actually difficult, because his photos look like very plain, mediocre snapshots of things...like a jacket lying on the floor, a gallon of spoiled milk in the fridge, or a cityscape (in fact, a lot people complain about this in his exhibitions, and had lots of negative feedback at one art biennial). I actually saw his work at one of the Chelsea galleries (and I reacted the same way), didn't know who he was, but I was able to identify who he later was by seeing his photographic "layouts" in some books/magazines.

But in his case it's not much about any one sole photograph but more in his presentation of them, which is kind of like an "installation piece" in a gallery...in his case like the walls are pages in a magazine. You begin to make out some sort of analogy between the disparity of his images, as if the photographs act as just a means to an end. This all came out of the basic question which was the basis of his Thesis project: "Why would you take yet another photograph, in an already photo-saturated world?".

It was after this project that my professor recommended I try looking more into photography (I wasn't really interested in it before), and I've been hooked ever since!
 
Hertz van Rental said:
What is the difference between taking a picture for your own pleasure and taking a picture to please someone else - remembering that giving pleasure to others is a way of getting pleasure for yourself.

The motive.
 

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account on our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom