BrianLy
TPF Noob!
- Joined
- Jun 3, 2010
- Messages
- 298
- Reaction score
- 0
- Location
- Los Angeles
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos OK to edit
SOME 3rd party batteries are good; SOME are average; SOME are absolute junk.
Thousands of dollars on camera equipment, only to try to save $25 on a battery? No thanks.
Thanks to everyone for there input, but I have specific questions for you.
You were the only one, or one of the only ones, to say "no deal".
Why?
It seems biased as you haven't given 3rd party batteries a chance
You're saying it from a "more money, better it HAS to be" kind of point of view.
To me a good example is, you wouldn't buy a 50mm f1.4 for $1000.
You would buy it for how much it goes for in the market.
Who's to say batteries have to be $100?
Why not get the $20 ones when the market shows them out there?
I'm not saying you're wrong, but you were the one who said different
If you have a good point to make, I want in
and I want to know before I make a bad purchase
Thanks!
Thousands of dollars on camera equipment, only to try to save $25 on a battery? No thanks.
Thanks to everyone for there input, but I have specific questions for you.
You were the only one, or one of the only ones, to say "no deal".
Why?
It seems biased as you haven't given 3rd party batteries a chance
You're saying it from a "more money, better it HAS to be" kind of point of view.
To me a good example is, you wouldn't buy a 50mm f1.4 for $1000.
You would buy it for how much it goes for in the market.
Who's to say batteries have to be $100?
Why not get the $20 ones when the market shows them out there?
I'm not saying you're wrong, but you were the one who said different
If you have a good point to make, I want in
and I want to know before I make a bad purchase
Thanks!
I absolutely have tried 3rd party photographic items in the past, ranging from batteries to lenses. My experience with 3rd party batteries was fine (side note: my experience with 3rd party lenses was not so good).
That being said, the 3rd party batteries I have used were for much less costly camera bodies. I am simply reluctant to use such batteries on my $1,200 body. Ultimately, it all comes down to a cost/benefit function, and I don't find the benefit outweighs the cost in this area. Simple as that. They may be perfectly fine, they may last long, etc. It has zero to do with "Nikon batteries are more expensive, they must be better". You yourself posted the question about the value and functionality of the 3rd party batteries, so minimally you seem to have some question in your mind.
You also state "...who says batteries have to be $100...why not get the $20 ones...". I have a D7000 now, but had a D90. An extra Nikon battery for the D90 was ~$45 if I recall. The extra Nikon battery I bought for the D7000 was ~$50. So we are not talking the difference between $100 and $20...not even close.
Lastly, even you stated from the beginning "My first experience sucked with a cheap battery, but I found this next one that appears to offer a 3 year." To me, that says it all!
Good thought except for one minor detail. Canon and Nikon Don't Make Batteries. They get them from a supplier that slaps their label on them. Same battery from the same supplier without the name brand label works just fine and costs less.
Hello
So I've bought a 2nd battery for my Nikon d90, for pretty cheap
$20 I think, via ebay.
I was under the impression it was OEM, but its materials quality lacks compared to my original
And it barely holds a charge.
I acquired a Nikon d5000 and I need a battery for it
Browsing eBay, I found replacement batteries for $6.63 shipped
It includes a 3 year warrantee.
Whats your take?
My first experience sucked with a cheap battery, but I found this next one that appears to offer a 3 year.
Also what's your take on chargers?
Cheap chargers okay?