- Joined
- Aug 15, 2013
- Messages
- 13,695
- Reaction score
- 3,369
- Location
- SE Michigan
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos OK to edit
50/1.8 AF-D vs 50/1.8 AF-S
I just took in hand a 50mm AF-S lens. Boy it focuses fast compared to the AF-D lens
Is there any reason to keep the AF-D lens?
But how do the two lenses in testing?
When I test the two side by side the AF-D lens appears sharper than the AF-S lens when you crop in. Have others had this?
The only quick advantage I see is the AF-D can go to f/22 whereas the AF-S only f/16
The AF-D is easier smoother manual focusing, though you have to flip a switch
and the AF-D you can see all the markings for those times you use full manual control, which, I haven't done at all since I first fiddled with my d7000 when it was new.
I certainly like these AF-S lenses. The AF-D allowed me to get a good lens collection at low cost though.
I also have coming a 70-300 VRII lens which is replacing my slow 75-300 AF lens. The focusing speed between those two should be drastic.
I just took in hand a 50mm AF-S lens. Boy it focuses fast compared to the AF-D lens
Is there any reason to keep the AF-D lens?
But how do the two lenses in testing?
When I test the two side by side the AF-D lens appears sharper than the AF-S lens when you crop in. Have others had this?
The only quick advantage I see is the AF-D can go to f/22 whereas the AF-S only f/16
The AF-D is easier smoother manual focusing, though you have to flip a switch
and the AF-D you can see all the markings for those times you use full manual control, which, I haven't done at all since I first fiddled with my d7000 when it was new.
I certainly like these AF-S lenses. The AF-D allowed me to get a good lens collection at low cost though.
I also have coming a 70-300 VRII lens which is replacing my slow 75-300 AF lens. The focusing speed between those two should be drastic.