jsecordphoto
Been spending a lot of time on here!
- Joined
- Oct 26, 2013
- Messages
- 1,493
- Reaction score
- 1,055
- Location
- new hampshire
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos OK to edit
Lol @ high ISO being some kind of gimmick.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
jsecordphoto said:Lol @ high ISO being some kind of gimmick.
Loads of noise at iso 400 implies your are under exposing. Expose correctly and you should have very little noise at even higher than this. Carry this over to your d750 and even that will work betterI rented one to hold me over while the d750 is being fixed, can't say that I'm too impressed. Granted, I'm comparing it to the 750, but the noise with this camera is pretty bad. Seeing tons of noise in blue sky even at iso400...
Loads of noise at iso 400 implies your are under exposing. Expose correctly and you should have very little noise at even higher than this. Carry this over to your d750 and even that will work betterI rented one to hold me over while the d750 is being fixed, can't say that I'm too impressed. Granted, I'm comparing it to the 750, but the noise with this camera is pretty bad. Seeing tons of noise in blue sky even at iso400...
Your welcome
don't know about the 7200, but i been saying the 7100 is scared of the dark for about a year and a half now. Depending on the light (as you mentioned exposure) i can push it up to about 1600 usually with a usable image and no major noise reduction.. Really like to stay under a thousand though. I would like to suggest that there is a a "fixed point" of actual usable iso. But there really isn't, all depends on the scene. Sometimes you have to or want to under expose. Higher iso's go soft and the shadow recovery can become problem some.. Not to say they can't be done, depends.. Keep in mind the 750 is full frame and twice the price. Two totally different levels.Your welcome
You're*
1. You're implying that I don't know how to read a histogram
And 2. Not every scene is evenly balanced where one exposure will cover all the tonal values. For example, photographing osprey I need to spot meter their white feathers otherwise I'd get a bunch of blown out highlights. On my 750 I can expose for the highlights and pull out shadow detail no problem even at iso1600 or higher without introducing a ton of noise. Even at base ISO on this camera I have to nail the exposure because trying to bring out shadow detail ends up looking terrible. Maybe I should just ask the ospreys to hold still while I bracket a few frames for HDR?
^^^ That's the problem.I'm just stating my experience with a camera that is touted to be pretty damn good with noise, dynamic range, and at high iso. Granted, I got spoiled with the 750. It's been pretty disappointing, especially the lack of dynamic range. It's not realistic to need a perfectly balanced scene all the time
yes. I can definitely see your dismay. You stepped down from a lexus to a mazda. I like the "gimmick" aspect that was mentioned. As it seems all my digitals have larger iso ranges than what i actually find to be "usable" iso.I'm just stating my experience with a camera that is touted to be pretty damn good with noise, dynamic range, and at high iso. Granted, I got spoiled with the 750. It's been pretty disappointing, especially the lack of dynamic range. It's not realistic to need a perfectly balanced scene all the time