photoguy99
No longer a newbie, moving up!
- Joined
- Mar 20, 2014
- Messages
- 1,485
- Reaction score
- 313
Well, the photo of Sal is a different beast yes. I might or might not have been able to shoot that one.
The key there is to see that there is a photo to be made. Turnley did a couple of things there.
- he recognized the look from his war experience. It's not a thing you really expect to see on a fireman.
- he reached beyond the enormity of the scene. He saw a photo about a man, not about the disaster. He was able to get beyond the pile, beyond the destruction, and make a much a photo of much more universal scope.
Seeing that there is a photo to be made is the hard part, almost always. A lot of what turnley does requires the ability to recognize that there's a photo, and recognize it very very fast. That is a skill I lack.
Would I have seen that there was a photo to be made of Sal? I have no idea. My money is on 'no' though. I think I would have missed it in the chaos.
The key there is to see that there is a photo to be made. Turnley did a couple of things there.
- he recognized the look from his war experience. It's not a thing you really expect to see on a fireman.
- he reached beyond the enormity of the scene. He saw a photo about a man, not about the disaster. He was able to get beyond the pile, beyond the destruction, and make a much a photo of much more universal scope.
Seeing that there is a photo to be made is the hard part, almost always. A lot of what turnley does requires the ability to recognize that there's a photo, and recognize it very very fast. That is a skill I lack.
Would I have seen that there was a photo to be made of Sal? I have no idea. My money is on 'no' though. I think I would have missed it in the chaos.