graecyn
TPF Noob!
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2010
- Messages
- 148
- Reaction score
- 15
- Location
- Cary, NC
- Website
- www.littlelamplight.com
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos NOT OK to edit
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
The girl could've been wearing a turtle neck sweater and it would not have hidden the fact that she is well endowed. Look at the train tracks photo.I don't think it is about "women have boobs" as much as it is about find the pose appropriate for the age of the girl.
Also, the clothing does not add to the composition AT ALL. If she was not wearing a low cut shirt, this would not be an issue because no cleavage would be showing.
Just something to note for future composition and posing.
I don't think it is about "women have boobs" as much as it is about find the pose appropriate for the age of the girl.
Also, the clothing does not add to the composition AT ALL. If she was not wearing a low cut shirt, this would not be an issue because no cleavage would be showing.
Just something to note for future composition and posing.
The girl could've been wearing a turtle neck sweater and it would not have hidden the fact that she is well endowed. Look at the train tracks photo.I don't think it is about "women have boobs" as much as it is about find the pose appropriate for the age of the girl.
Also, the clothing does not add to the composition AT ALL. If she was not wearing a low cut shirt, this would not be an issue because no cleavage would be showing.
Just something to note for future composition and posing.
Here's another slant........ she seems to be well proportioned. Typically when you see a young girl that is stacked (and I mean that in the kindest terms), the ass is two axe handles wide. Kudos to the model.
Wanna see two axe handles wide? I'll show you two axe handles wide. Here's two axe handles wide...........
:lmao::lmao::lmao::lmao:
1. She looks really uncomfortable and like everyone else my attention went to the train first.
2. I think this could have been a good shot had so much cleavage not been showing and you left her legs on ( and I have this SAME problem).
3. I actually like this one okay but it would have been better had you not zoomed in so close.
I do hope the nasty people on here do not stop you from seeking advice and C&C. The only way to improve is to take pictures and figure out what you can do better next time. While there may be some people who can pick up a camera and just naturally shoot fantastic photos, that is not most. Most have to shoot and learn along the way so keep it up! Oh and next time just don't post pictures like number 2 for C&C (or anywhere)
In offering criticism, one must look for signs that there is some sensitivity on the part of the photographer to certain basics of composition, lighting, etc. You also look for signs the criticism would be understood. I see no reason to expect the author of these to develop a great deal further. I just cannot imagine it. There are sometimes weaknesses mixed in with strengths in anyone's work. I see no strengths here at all, no comprehension of how a two-dimensional image works. There is no sense of space, no sense of proportion, of lighting, at all.
There is no understanding of 'order', no organization. Everything is just jumbled together.
Wow. I understand you are kinda going overboard to make your point but are you serious? Do you really feel like the OP cannot progress any further as a photographer? Was I reading your post wrong?
I think you mean that YOU do not use those terms.but you don't use the terms stacked and two ass handles wide to describe a teen.....
Thank you, Aye-non. You did what I didn't have the energy to do. He has shown this snapshot before as an example of supreme photography. BTW, I find it far creepier that he zoomed in on a teenage girl before she noticed; way more worrisome than the OP's photo of a girl wearing what she probably wears to school every day.
Nope. I don't think this individual knows his ass from a hole in the ground.Nope. I don't think this individual can see in two dimensions.
You are way off base here, and way out of line. This was a public festival, and some girls even go topless. It is sort of a hippie festival. There is nothing wrong with taking photos of people in public places.
Furthermore, I have never claimed it as an "example of supreme photography".
:lmao::lmao::lmao::lmao::lmao::lmao:Thank you, Aye-non. You did what I didn't have the energy to do. He has shown this snapshot before as an example of supreme photography. BTW, I find it far creepier that he zoomed in on a teenage girl before she noticed; way more worrisome than the OP's photo of a girl wearing what she probably wears to school every day.
You are way off base here, and way out of line. This was a public festival, and some girls even go topless. It is sort of a hippie festival. There is nothing wrong with taking photos of people in public places.
Furthermore, I have never claimed it as an "example of supreme photography".
Why would you put your own childs boobs on the internet? That is worse. Maybe I am out of touch with reality but you think it is ok to do that? I am at a loss for words as I will never comprehend a mother displaying a daughter like that. I am old fashioned maybe but I do not agree with that sort of picture with a child to begin with and for some reason I would think a person would have an ounce of comprehension that they are displaying their child inappropriately. You should not be offended you should be ashamed.
Nope. I don't think this individual knows his ass from a hole in the ground.Nope. I don't think this individual can see in two dimensions.