PaulWog
No longer a newbie, moving up!
- Joined
- Jun 17, 2013
- Messages
- 1,153
- Reaction score
- 188
- Location
- Canada
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos NOT OK to edit
Hi,
I am looking into purchasing a new DSLR camera, I have been checking out two Nikon models (3200 & 5200). I have been told by a store that there is no difference between these two models except video capabilities. I am looking for recommendations or reviews on both or either model.
I am looking to do stop motion, scenery, portrait, digital zoom and something that is not hard to focus and has anti-shake.
Anyone?
Well actually what you were told isn't exactly accurate. The D5200 has in camera HDR for one, which is nice for landscapes and such. It shoots a little faster (5 fps as opposed to 4), has the articulating screen (not a feature I use but for shooting video or lining up a still shot on a tripod it can be very handy), it has a better autofocus system and a little bit better image quality thanks to an improved dynamic range. It's also a bit better in low light but not by a huge margin.
The D3200 really is designed for beginners and I generally recommend it for people who are wanting a DSLR but it's not something they are going to use often. The D5200 is something I recommend for folks that may be new to photography or who have some experience but are really looking to go to the next level - it's a camera you can grow into rather than something you'll grow out of if that makes any sense.
The in-camera HDR on the D5200 is Jpeg only. I find it to be a useless feature
With that said, the only reason I think anyone should get a D3200 over a D5200 is if money is a major factor. The swivel screen on the D5200 alone has been huge for me -- it has allowed me to get shots that I couldn't otherwise have gotten.