Who stated that he did not believe digital photography is photography. Something that especially caught my attention mostly was the part "Traditional photography used the darkroom to pass light through a negative, to project a latent image onto a paper coated with silver halide. It took intelligence, a brain, a skill learned through books or a class to know how to expose film properly, develop it, and create a permanent or semi permanent photograph." So according to him beacuse I don't use a darkroom, I'm stupid? I've never met someone like this until now but have heard of them before. I can see where he's coming from, but still it seems fairly narrow minded. Has anyone else run across people like this? I have already posed a response to him about what I think about digital photography (I can post it if anyone is interested) but I was wondering if anyone else had opinions to why or why not Digital images can be considered Photography.