Solarflare
No longer a newbie, moving up!
- Joined
- May 24, 2012
- Messages
- 2,898
- Reaction score
- 395
Well, personally, weight doesnt bother me. I like prime lenses anyway, so the weight of the camera is never really high. And Fuji X is simply too small for my hands. Whats the point of having a camera thats more lightweight that I can barely hold like my Ricoh GR ? Which is comfortable with the GR because its very lightweight. But Fuji X still weights some !
Also my Nikon gear is excellent anyway. My only problem is reliably focusing my manual lenses.
The new GFX is something I would love to get but soooo expensive and I'm just a hobbyist. Its not a generalist camera though, either way. Its a specialist for ultimate IQ.
And the image quality has been good from day one - with the excellent 35/1.4 - and has since only gotten better.
I would also say the average image quality from Fuji lenses is higher than from Nikon and Canon. Of course, the lenses are also more expensive.
Which leads to the issue of build quality. Which other company still offers all metal lenses, mostly with aperture rings ? Certainly not Nikon.
Also my Nikon gear is excellent anyway. My only problem is reliably focusing my manual lenses.
The new GFX is something I would love to get but soooo expensive and I'm just a hobbyist. Its not a generalist camera though, either way. Its a specialist for ultimate IQ.
Disagreed. The newest generation of Fuji X cameras is nothing to sneeze at anymore at all. Great generalist cameras, especially the X-T2 with the "booster" grip, thanks to the new autofocus module.I will lose a lot flexibility and performance
And the image quality has been good from day one - with the excellent 35/1.4 - and has since only gotten better.
I would also say the average image quality from Fuji lenses is higher than from Nikon and Canon. Of course, the lenses are also more expensive.
Which leads to the issue of build quality. Which other company still offers all metal lenses, mostly with aperture rings ? Certainly not Nikon.