PaulWog
No longer a newbie, moving up!
- Joined
- Jun 17, 2013
- Messages
- 1,153
- Reaction score
- 188
- Location
- Canada
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos NOT OK to edit
True and true. I feel the D5300 is a good buy given that it uses the latest tech and also Expeed 4. IQ is comparable to D7100. My only real complains are there's no weather sealing and it can't AF older lenses. It has great value for a mid entry level cam. Price wise I think the D7100 has dropped but still quite far off from the D5300 no?
The processor inside of the D5300 is inconsequential. What matters is what the camera can do. Instead of mentioning that it has an Expeed 4, I argue that it would be better to examine why it has an Expeed 4 and what that processing power is allocated to. In the case of the D5300, it comes down to 60fps 1080p video, and more complex image processing (that's essentially the long and short of it).
The D7100 is $1000 currently at many retailers. The D5300 is $800 at the lowest-priced retailer. The D5200 is $600 at the lowest-priced retailer. It's a no-brainer. Anyone who buys a D5300 instead of the D7100 is making a mistake... unless if they're PURELY buying the D5300 for video. On the no-AA-filter end of things, that's really not going to make a huge difference... if someone is really that concerned with the AA filter, they're probably shooting very specific scenes such as specific macro scenes, specific landscape scenes, etc... in which case they'd probably be using a different camera altogether.
Anyways, what I'm arguing is that stripping out the AA filter and adding 60fps 1080p video are the reasons for the $200 price hike. If someone wants to spend $200 more for the video, then that makes sense. If someone wants to spend $200 more for the AA filter change, then they really have to be a niche photographer who's on a budget and knows exactly what they want. Otherwise, spend $200 more for a D7100, or $200 less for a D5200... better money spent in my opinion.
edit: GPS features are really a huge battery drainer, and on a camera like the D5300, I see it as useless. The Wi-fi feature makes sense. I suppose those might be selling features. I just see the D5300 as a budget camera just like the D5200... and the D5200 out-budgetifies the D5300. If someone wants to splurge for features, that's why I think the D7100 sits at a better position right now. That's why I just think the D5300 is that niche camera that appeals to people who mistakenly think these new features matter, or to someone who is part of a very select minority of knowledgeable buyers who needs specific features.