Which Nikon Lens

Discussion in 'Photography Equipment & Products' started by Steve, Aug 14, 2003.

  1. Steve

    Steve TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2003
    Messages:
    1
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Melbourne, Australia
    I am about to purchase a Nikon F100, and will be doing a lot of portrait photography. The problem is, I can't decide between the 105mm F/2 DC or the 85mm 1.4 lens. Can anyone suggest the better lens for portrait work with the F100?
     
  2. oriecat

    oriecat work in progress

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2003
    Messages:
    3,118
    Likes Received:
    19
    Location:
    Portland OR USA
    Take this all with a grain of salt, as I often don't know what I'm talking about... but I've often read that about 80mm is the ideal length for portraiture. And it would be faster as well. 8)
     
  3. Chase

    Chase I am now benign! Staff Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2003
    Messages:
    7,810
    Likes Received:
    51
    Location:
    Deep in the heart of Texas!
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    I would tend to agree. The difference between 85 and 105mm isn't huge, so I think I would lean heavily towards the faster lense.
     
  4. james m

    james m TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2003
    Messages:
    89
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Sydney
    you could also look at a Nikkor zoom like the AF-S 80-200/2.8 or the new AF-S VR 70-200/2.8
     
  5. KBOC

    KBOC TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2003
    Messages:
    63
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Rancho el Valley de San Jose
    Back when I was doing photography, the lower limit for portrait lenses was considered 90mm (the upper limit was considerd to be 105mm, with 100mm being ideal). Anything below that and common wisdom was that it was getting to "fish-eye" to create a flattering picture.

    A 100mm F2 is pretty fast for a 100mm, but that 85mm is extraordinarily fast.
     
  6. KBOC

    KBOC TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2003
    Messages:
    63
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Rancho el Valley de San Jose
    It appears, on doing a search, that the wisdom has changed.

    I'm now looking at a pentax 85mm F1.4 Lens being touted as a portrait lens...

    I'd be interested in seeing a comparrison between 100mm and 85mm lenses for portraits...
     
  7. voodoocat

    voodoocat ))<>(( Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 15, 2003
    Messages:
    5,277
    Likes Received:
    17
    Location:
    Gilbert, AZ
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos NOT OK to edit
    Both of those lenses would probably be equally as sharp. That extra stop would be nice. I may splurge and spend $60 on a 135mm 2.8 lens. I have a macro lens that is 3.5 but would rather have a seperate lens to use for portrait work.
     
  8. KBOC

    KBOC TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2003
    Messages:
    63
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Rancho el Valley de San Jose
    voodoocat, it's the perspective that is the question...

    teeny tiny changes can make a person look better.

    The question I would ask is this: which focal length creates the most pleasing portraits...

    The difference wouldn't be huge, but it would be significant I think.

    If the current prevailing wisdom is that 85mm is better, Pentax and Nikon seem to agree on this, I think there's some weight to that... especially when 20 years ago people thought otherwise.
     
  9. doxx

    doxx TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2003
    Messages:
    499
    Likes Received:
    2
    Location:
    behind the viewfinder
    the 85mm is a half f-stop faster. Might be important for low light/indoor portraiture...
    Look for reviews (photo.net) and pics if you like the bokeh (the blurry part in portraits)
     

Share This Page