105/ 2.8 or 70-200 2.8


TPF Noob!
Sep 2, 2010
Reaction score
i've been wanting the sigma 70-200 2.8 for a while now but recently i've been thinkin about the 105 2.8 nikon micro, both are about the same price. The zoom obviously has the advantage of being alot more versatile while the prime is from nikon and i would like to stick with the name if i have the system. Also i like doing macro stuff but never really gotten beyond extension tubes which are annoying because they dont let me meter, so the 105 would allow me to do alot more macro and would be fun to do more macro with it since everything will work the way it should. it would also be an awesome portrait lens iam thinkin which is what i would buy the 70-200 for, a walk around lens.
Ne suggestions as to what to go with?
A macro lens can be used for more than just macro too.

If you feel you'll need the extra zoom, go for the zoom, I hear the sigma is nice

Most reactions

New Topics