eric-holmes
No longer a newbie, moving up!
- Joined
- Aug 8, 2009
- Messages
- 1,859
- Reaction score
- 49
- Location
- Arkansas
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos OK to edit
The first was actually framed like the second before PP. She just became a consultant for one of those businesses that women throw parties with, similar to Avon or Mary Kay. She mentioned using one of these pictures with some text on the side. So, I stretched it out and appeased her.Just outta curiosity, why the weird framing in the first? The second is much better, but i agree that the hair seems a little too 'flat'
GREAT JOB HERE ! ! !! I love your thirds rule in the first picture! ! ! ! ! YESSS I said Thirds RULE ! !! ! Its a great concept and I use it ALOT
and her hair looks GREAT ! ! ! !
TRUST me on this , , I know! ! ! ! !
GREAT JOB HERE ! ! !! I love your thirds rule in the first picture! ! ! ! ! YESSS I said Thirds RULE ! !! ! Its a great concept and I use it ALOT
and her hair looks GREAT ! ! ! !
TRUST me on this , , I know! ! ! ! !
No, I didn't dodge any under her eyes. I might could blend it with a patch selection but I have found that too much dodging on the skin can really start to mess with the skin tones, especially the burn tool. Best if used in extreme moderation.I think they are good too.Did you dodge under the eyes in PP? If so, I think it could be blended better, if not, then maybe try blending it better..
Id also dodge the dark spots under the eyes. But thats just me, and I'm having a lot of fun with my dodge and burn tools right now... lol
eric-holmes said:The first was actually framed like the second before PP. She just became a consultant for one of those businesses that women throw parties with, similar to Avon or Mary Kay. She mentioned using one of these pictures with some text on the side. So, I stretched it out and appeased her.
Thank you.