Hi all, I have been shopping a lot lately (to much GAS) and now have 7 lenses... I would like to reduce this number to 5 lenses. But I need some help from you guys. (I use a D7500 camera and no intentions to go FX). I have the following lenses: A 10-20mm DX nikon lens, I like the wide angle, but I feel it's not enough... I then got myself a fish eye samyang 8mm and I really feel I am using this a lot more! So much more fun. So I am thinking to sell the 10-20mm lens. Also, then main purpose of the lens was for wide angle at night, but it is not fast enough for it... Then I got the Sigma 18-35 f/1.8 This lens is beautiful, fast and strong. And despite only 18mm at the wide end, I can take better pictures at night with the F/1.8 I also got the Nikon 16-80 f/2.8-4 lens and the tamron 16-300mm lens (And a nikon 200-500mm and tamron 90mm macro, but these are not important now for my question). I am looking for a lens that can reach about 300mm and is optically an improvement to the tamron 16-300 and close (can be bit less) to the 16-80 nikon. This is for, in combination with my sigma 18-35, ment for traveling and handyness. Thing is, I got 3x the 16(18)-35mm range covered... I really love the sigma, so I want to keep that one. So basically I want to sell my nikon 10-20, nikon 16-80 and tamron 16-300. What do I want instead? Well... The 10-20 doesn't really need replacing, I am fine with the samyang. The 16-80 is an awesome lens, but at 16 i really have to stop it down to f4 (f2.8 is just soft). 80mm is also to short for traveling, since I like to take some wildlife pics (my other 200-500 lens is just to big for travels). The tamron 16-300 is handy, but soft at 300mm and simply not that great, handy to travel yes, but great, no... So what lens should I get instead? I am reading about: Nikon 18-300 Nikon 28-300 FX Nikon 55-300 DX Nikon 70-300 DX Nikon 70-300 FX Or how about a 70-200 F/4 lens? Perhaps the tamron 70-210 F/4? On my last travel I did, i took my nikon 16-80 and tamron 16-300. Mostly the nikon was used and occasionally nthe tamron if I saw some wildlife. I didn't think about taking my sigma, just because I knew that if I took it, i would be using my tamron for anything above 35, and I didn't want that. The nikon 16-80 is just way superior to the tamron there. 1 problem is, if I go for a lens starting at 70mm+, I have a big gap between 35 and 70mm. So I am leaning more towards the nikon 18-300 or 28-300 (but are these so much better then my tamron 16-300?). I am thinking, with selling those 3 lenses, I will get close to €1000, so that is my absolute max budget (can be used lenses as well). Also weight and size is important, I read like a 70-200 f/4 is close to 900gr. This is absolutely the maximum weight I want for this lens while traveling. So what are you guys thinking? What other lenses or options do I have, tamron, sigma, tokina? If only there was a 35-300mm lens f/4 VR DX! Alright, thanks!